Police
Report on Anglican Bishop of Sabah on deals
with irregularities. March, 2014
I, as a member of All Saints’ Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu
and Anglican Diocese of Sabah want the Police and other relevant authorities to
review some of the many deals done by the Anglican Bishop of Sabah Datuk Albert
Vun Cheong Fui of Wisma Anglican, Jalan Lee Tet
Phui, 88000 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah,
Malaysia. (6088-245846; 249296) when such deals with
irregularities as exposed by the Investigation Report of the Provincial
Advisory Committee (PAC) dated 27th August, 2012. The Investigation Report from the House of
Bishops of the Anglican Province of Churches in South East
Asia (APSEA) was marked “Strictly
Confidential” to the five complainants.
After two of the complainants filed a civil suit to the High Court, the
PAC’s Reports were gradually published in a popular blog since February, 2014.
2. The
Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee) has committed many criminal breaches of
trust as alleged and an instance of perjury in a Sworn Affidavit in Opposition
dated 30th July, 2012 as per appendix A against my Writ of Summons
in a High Court in Sabah and Sarawak at Kota
Kinabalu Suit No. KK-22-128/6 of 2012 where Albert Vun wrote in paragraph 8 (1)
and I quote “ My role as Bishop under Para 2 of Article VI is only over matters
of Faith and Order. Under Para. 3, the
Diocesan Synod has the power to make standing order and regulations for the
proper conduct of the business of the Diocese.
I am only the Chairman of the meeting of the Diocesan Synod.”
3. As
we go through the first few items of exposed deals of the PAC’s reports, we can
come to the conclusion that the Bishop of Sabah played a principle role to initiate,
influence and even fixed the deals which later emerged with confirmed irregularities
and embezzlement.
There are just a sample of cases for your
urgent review as follows:-
3.1 Acquisition
of Sipitang Land.
(simply too much over priced) – Appendix B.
3.2 Acquisition of Tenom Shoplots ( details in
para 4 below) - Appendix C.
3.3 Acquisition of Menggatal Land (conflict of interests and intention) –
Appendix D.
3.4 Use
of Project Fund – purchase of Alphard. (misappropriation and abuses) – Appendix
E.
I will highlight the bias and dominant
roles of Bishop of Sabah with the notes of each item as enclosed.
4
There
are more documents on the purchase of the Tenom shophouse, I would pursue it in
greater details as this case had been dealt with by the MACC which appeared to
clear the case of any irregularities and alleged CBT. I would like to highlight
this case so that a review by MACC is urgently needed as per appendix B. Then
Bishop using the “inadequacy” of MACC to cover one’s modus operandi of crime is
unacceptable hence MACC is urged review its earlier investigation based on the
guidelines given in Appendix B.
5.
The
Bishop of Sabah must be reminded of several allegations of Criminal Breach of Trusts
as published in the article of Daily Express of 17th July, 2012
titled “Bishop under Probe” and the demanded apology by the Diocesan Chancellor
was not forthcoming and Daily Express was not taken to Court confirming that
the allegations of crimes were genuine.
See Appendix F.
6. In Daily Express on 6th March,
2014, an article titled “Suit against Bishop was dismissed” contained
defamatory words, insinuations, inaccuracies, misrepresentation, as to give the
false impression to cover up the Bishop’s criminal activities. The seditious article without the name of the
writer is deemed to have implicated Daily Express an accomplice in the crimes
of Anglican Diocese of Sabah headed by Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee) and
ill advised by the Diocesan Chancellor Datuk Stephen Foo. Dragging me in as a disgruntled parishioner
in the article is certainly unjustified and tantamount to criminal defamation
in a malicious effort of all the parties concerned seen and unseen in that
article. See Appendix G.
7. I would urge the Police, the relevant
authorities especially Malaysia Anti Corruption Agency and the Inland Revenue
Board after proper and complete investigation initiate action to the Attorney
General for an appropriate prosecution against various parties such as Albert
Vun, Stephen Foo, Daily Express and others over alleged offences including
perjury, CBT, thefts, tax evasion, sedition, indefensible civil and secular crimes
and abuses of public funds.
Joshua Y. C. Kong, P. O. Box 11923,
88821 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. 6013-8394513.
who want to accompany me to the Police Station for a Police Report on the biggest LIAR avcf..?
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Peter, that maybe so but who can be the plaintiff with the locus
standi for CBT? Also a Police Report would be needed and how to get
through the Police permission? Then much cost is involved and a lot of
work is needed to get the right kind of evidence? We all want to see
AVCF go to jail.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Lets look at the CBT positively.
1. What are the conditions for CBT to be filed?
2. If HOBs of APSEA strips AVCF as a Bishop for obvious reason, then it is easier to charge him for CBT.
3. For CBT, we need the documentary evidence, and how to get them when he locks everything away.
4. It is either the Synod and the HOB of APSEA sue AVCF for CBT and maybe both Synod and HoB both non legal entity cannot sue AVCF and the SC for CBT.
5. So it is up to MACC and Police/AG to take AVCF to Court for CBT, provided the Police is prepare to raid ADOS office for documents.
6. So who want to lodge Police Reports to be accepted by the Police and maybe we need to go to the Police Station in the hundred or even thousands to influence the Police to act now.
7. Once the Police Reports are accepted, then the opening of CBT, Commercial Crimes, Perjury, Income Tax and thefts can be possibilities.
2. If HOBs of APSEA strips AVCF as a Bishop for obvious reason, then it is easier to charge him for CBT.
3. For CBT, we need the documentary evidence, and how to get them when he locks everything away.
4. It is either the Synod and the HOB of APSEA sue AVCF for CBT and maybe both Synod and HoB both non legal entity cannot sue AVCF and the SC for CBT.
5. So it is up to MACC and Police/AG to take AVCF to Court for CBT, provided the Police is prepare to raid ADOS office for documents.
6. So who want to lodge Police Reports to be accepted by the Police and maybe we need to go to the Police Station in the hundred or even thousands to influence the Police to act now.
7. Once the Police Reports are accepted, then the opening of CBT, Commercial Crimes, Perjury, Income Tax and thefts can be possibilities.
Police
Report on Anglican Diocese of Sabah on Tenom shophouse – TL no. 167503844
I want to
urge the Police and other relevant authorities to deal with this irregularities
affecting various groups of people on the purchase of shop Lot No. 6 ,
Block A, PANGIE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
COMPLEX, Tenom, 89907 Sabah.
Different
opinions had been expressed by the Auditor in his management report dated 29th
of Auugust, 2012,, the reply by the Diocesean Secretary of October, 2012 and now the handling of the
Sale & Purchase by the Standing Committee vis-à-vis the vendor as exposed
by the blog on the Provincial Advisory Committee’s report now released.
While there
is a suspect of collaboration over the selling price inflated with the inclusive
price of RM50,000 charity and further suspicion has arisen as Bishop Albert Vun
reported as
“ PAC Report :Acquisition of Tenom shop lot
134. Bav had
disclosed to the PAC that the MACC had visited the Diocesan office and inquired
about this matter. According to him MACC was satisfied with the
clarification. Notwithstanding this however,
the PAC understands that under the stamp Duty Act cap 378, falsely declaring
the purchase price in a Sale & Purchase Agreement of property may attract
penal sanctions either as a simple act of tax evasion (s610 or as an act of
fraud on revenue (s74). Such offences
appear however to be compoundable and as such steps should be taken to remedy this to avoid embarrassment to the
office of the Bishop.”
In any
normal case of corruption the giver and the receiver are equally liable to be
answerable to such allegation. In this
case if closer scrutiny is done on the
available documents such as the S&P Agreement and the payment vouchers, the ingredients or foot
prints of corruption are observed as iit is unusual that the buyer had to make
additional payment of RM50,000 for the seller or developer to do charity. The modus operandi of the additional amount
does indicate a strong case of corruption coupled with abuse of payments
procedure. Then using the inadequacy of
MACC to cover one’s modus operandi of crime is unacceptable hence MACC is urged
review its earlier investigation based on the guidelines given in Appendix 1.
Why lodge Police Report now rather than later?
If we wait till all 38 reports in the truthasc, it would take
90 days and that is May, 2014 and another 6 months for the authorities to work
on them to come up with appropriate action which may never come because the
authorities including the Police consider it is an internal matter involving
private money as stolen by AVCF in tricky ways.
How to enforce CBT when there is no official relationship between
an employer and employee? AVCF is the
one in control with prerogative power and serviced by some ‘lapdogs”in the name
of God or AVCF??
The only way we can catch AVCF is the position of sole
trustee but if we go to Courts, he will plea himself an illegal sole trustee
hence the Courts would let him go. His
lawyers are worst than AVCF in stealing in more ways than expected.
So two fast strategies are deal with the sole tustee and the
persons who signed cheques without responsibilities.
The other is the Tenom case where some people have complete
documents where the Government was cheated of stamp duties and the government would
act if IRD is aware of that.
Like the Sipitang case, we don’t even have the title number
of the 2.07 ac land sold for RM850,000, RM600,000 more than the market price.
Again the Police and others are not interested, as private money is concerned.
When I want to lodge Police Reports, they will tell you that
you have all the committees, and how to make them believe our committees are
fools.
So don’t wait as in May and then in December, 2014, AVCF may
become the Archbishop of APSEA even it is a Non Legal Entity and so AVCF would
create more havoc in the Anglican
Province in South East Asia. If not
Archbishop of SEA, it can be Archbishop of Sabah and Ransit etc.
So the Tenom case is the best one and an immediate action is
possible and we can add on as wwe go along.
Finally, we have to protect the ASC grounds at all
costs. Anything can happen to All Saints’
Cathedral.
I am just a humble whistle blower for God’s kingdom on earth
and am doing it with great sacrifice.
Pray about it and action is of paramount importance now.
I will prepare the Police Report on the Tenom land.
Joshua Kong 013-8394513
I hope to make 2 Police reports of my own.anyone wants to join me next week to make on ADOS.
013-8394513
No comments:
Post a Comment