Saturday, February 28, 2015
ADOS is the real loser in both civil suits.
Another item of technicality that my case against Albert Vun was wrong party.
If we study the Appeal Court's Judgement of Archbishop case, Bolly was ruled a valid defendant as he was in control
of APSEA although APSEA has a Constitution.
So likewise Albert Vun was in control of ADOS, and so where got "wrong party"?
Dear Anglicans,
If we scrutinise the Government Proceeding Act and the terms thereof and the Bishop of Sabah wanted to claim protection from that Act as consent needs to be granted by the AG for two plaintiffs.
On the other hand like any law is a double edged sword, and if the Bishop has failed under that Act as his appointment is by the TYT, the State AG must file a case against the Bishop for failure to discharge his duty of Trust as a Registered Trustee.
My counsel did ask the State AG if he wanted to pursue the prosecution but that was turned down for known agenda. So the State AG also failed.
So there is grave injustice when I lost the locus standi to pursue my case as simply GPA. So Bishop continued to flourish in his crimes until he disappeared on 15 July, 2014.
Any one got anything to add? We need to set up a commission of truth.
Friday, February 27, 2015
Need to do this properly
Dear C,
So if this is not done Tais is also an "illegitimate" Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), especially
Timmie Liew wrote that 6th Bishop of Sabah is appointed by the House of Bishop when APSEA is House of BishopS, and
House of Bishop is also Bishop of Canterbury.
Maybe APSEA has passed on to the BoC to appoint 6th Bishop when that is in the Provincial Constitution. What is what now?
We must be sure what is what now and not another Legal Challenge of negligence.
Joshua
Dear Joshua,
There was no filing. That is why it still read Archbishop of Canterbury. Kenneth Thien should have filed the change but was negligent. They should get this done first before they amend the trustee and install the new bishop.
If not, anybody can challenge the legality of Bishop of Sabah as it is appointed by the Archbishop of APSEA instead of Archbishop of Canterbury as presently stated.
C
Dear Rev C ,
Who had actually file the Summon in High Court and when?
APSEA was formed in 1996 and Albert was appointed in 2006.
Whose fault then?
The incorporated name is "The Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). not Bishop of Sabah - which is illegal.
I had a few words with Dtk Roderic about Albert at the ASC AGM 2014 as illegitimate Bishop and he said nothing wrong.
So how? If the going goes tough, ADOS may lose all assets.
Joshua
Dear Joshua,
I think you have a case on the Archbishop of Canterbury. The Chancellor before the present one failed to rectified this item in the trustee incorporation Terms and Conditions. They have to file a summon in the high court to amend it to read the Archbishop of APSEA instead of Archbishop of Canterbury. The transfer of authority and jurisdiction has been done legally and stated in the Constitution but they failed to "update" the Trustee Incorporation.
Cfu
going by all the agreements in both civil cases over and against avcf, AVCF was illegitimate bishop in all context.
Dear Bishop Tais and Dean,
This motion may not be necessary at the AGM of ASC if there is firm commitment and full transparency of all transactions in ADOS properties and that this mistake be rectified immediately before the AGM on 29 March, 2015
Joshua
Motion 4 --
The Mother Church - All Saints’ Cathedral must make sure that the appointed new 6th Bishop of Sabah be done legally within the
Constitutions of Diocese of Sabah and Provincial Constitution of Anglican Church in South East Asia for the protection of all assets of the .
Anglican Diocese of Sabah.
Rational:-
1. Going by the sort of undesirable arguments and developments by the learned Counsel and team of advisors acting for the Bishop of Sabah and Archbishop in two civil suits since 2012 and ended on 24 November, 2104, any thing could be possible including Res Judicata and "non-legal entity". We must put the legality of the 6th Bishop of Sabah -Registered Trustee in proper perspective.
2. Which House of Bishop, when Bishop is singular? Can it be House of Bishop of Canterbury? House of Bishops of SEA Province? or remotely possible "House of Bishop" of Sabah? According to the not updated Certificate of Incorporation of the Trustees (Incorporation) Ordinance Cap 148, the name as incorporated under the name of Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), but according the Conditions attached thereof was in Condition 6 that Bishop of Sabah be appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and in the case of Albert CF Vun, he was appointed by the sort of once “non-legal” entity APSEA and that Archbishop of “non-legal” entity APSEA. We must make this beyond all doubts legally and avoid any challenge for the 6th Bishop of Sabah.
3. Several titles I had seen is owned by the Bishop of Sabah while a land transaction done by the Keningau lawyer was right to show the owner as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). The lawyer acting for Albert Vun did state this but had he informed the late exBishop of Sabah?
3. The full ramifications (legal, religious and spiritual) could arise if the proper House of Bishop is not defined and ASC be under an illegal Bishop of Sabah with grave consequences when the 6th Bishop is once again challenged to perform. He may declare himself an "illegal" Bishop and free to do as he likes with the prerogative power still in the ADOS constitution.
4. God is the God of order and so ADOS must put in order many disputed matters internally only if the vested parties want to listen and not to be dragged and prolonged to the Civil Courts by sort of learned lawyers for hidden agenda especially with last minute withdrawal at the Federal Court. Maybe we need to have a new Diocesan Chancellor and the ADOS land registrar to put all the records in proper order.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
the 6th Bishop of Sabah
Dear Dean and others,
When I used to propose motions in the time of Dean Koo, they were generally discussed in AGMs.
Now especially, since Albert was the acting Dean, motions were largely "ignored" and rejected.
So is Albert still alive in the body ?
Very sad day for Anglicans as Albert legacy is going to ruin everything Christians.
God bless His church.
Joshua Kong
Has the 6th Bishop of Sabah truly repented of his "cult" following in ADOS? If not, how can he be in the position to undo all the rottenness in ADOS? Did VC chaired the Synod in August/Sept 2014 as little had been exposed? If that same person does not amend for God's sake, ADOS already in very bad shape is really doom. His appointment as 6th Bishop by House of Bishop can be challenged both secularly, legally and spiritually. We had seen how the Diocese Chancellors had failed in many times if only the full report on the "crimes" of AVCF is made public after the Court of Appeal had ordered it on 23 May, 2014.
Monday, February 23, 2015
ADOS's Synod Annual Report 2012-2013 wanted
Dear Anglican friends,
In the
superior interest of Anglicans in Sabah, in term of transparency and
accountability, please publish the last "audited" accounts of Synod of
ADOS for the years 2012 and 2013 at the last Synod's meeting in Aug/Sept
2014.6013-8394513
Joshua Kong's 4 Motions
Dear Dean and others,
When I used to propose motions in the time of Dean Koo, they were generally discussed in AGMs.
Now especially, since Albert was the acting Dean, motions were largely "ignored" and rejected.
So is Albert still alive in the body ?
Very sad day for Anglicans as Albert legacy is going to ruin everything Christians.
God bless His church.
Joshua Kong
20 March 2015
Mr. Kong Yun Chee @ Joshua
Kota Kinabalu
Dear Sir
Motions Proposed for All Saints’ Cathedral (‘ASC’) Annual General Meeting on 29 March 2015
The above matter refers.
The Parochial Church Council (PCC) in a meeting convened on 17 March 2015 has deliberated on the motions proposed by you through letters dated 14 March 2015.
After discussion and consideration, the PCC has decided that the motions shall not be tabled this coming AGM due to the fact that they are outside the jurisdiction of Cathedral AGM to make decision on such matters.
Yours faithfully
Hon. Secretary of PCC
4 motions submitted on Saturday 14/3/2015 by fax and email. please support.
Dear Bishop Tais and Dean,
This motion may not be necessary at the AGM of ASC if there is firm commitment and full transparency of all transactions in ADOS properties and that this mistake be rectified immediately before the AGM on 29 March, 2015
Joshua
Motion 4 --
The Mother Church - All Saints’ Cathedral must make sure that the appointed new 6th Bishop of Sabah be done legally within the
Constitutions of Diocese of Sabah and Provincial Constitution of Anglican Church in South East Asia for the protection of all assets of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah.
Rational:-
1. Going by the sort of undesirable arguments and developments by the learned Counsel and team of advisors acting for the Bishop of Sabah and Archbishop in two civil suits since 2012 and ended on 24 November, 2104, any thing could be possible including Res Judicata and "non-legal entity". We must put the legality of the 6th Bishop of Sabah -Registered Trustee in proper perspective.
2. Which House of Bishop, when Bishop is singular? Can it be House of Bishop of Canterbury? House of Bishops of SEA Province? or remotely possible "House of Bishop" of Sabah? According to the not updated Certificate of Incorporation of the Trustees (Incorporation) Ordinance Cap 148, the name as incorporated under the name of Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), but according the Conditions attached thereof was in Condition 6 that Bishop of Sabah be appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and in the case of Albert CF Vun, he was appointed by the sort of once “non-legal” entity APSEA and that Archbishop of “non-legal” entity APSEA. We must make this beyond all doubts legally and avoid any challenge for the 6th Bishop of Sabah.
3. Several titles I had seen is owned by the Bishop of Sabah while a land transaction done by the Keningau lawyer was right to show the owner as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). The lawyer acting for Albert Vun did state this but had he informed the late exBishop of Sabah?
3. The full ramifications (legal, religious and spiritual) could arise if the proper House of Bishop is not defined and ASC be under an illegal Bishop of Sabah with grave consequences when the 6th Bishop is once again challenged to perform. He may declare himself an "illegal" Bishop and free to do as he likes with the prerogative power still in the ADOS constitution.
4. God is the God of order and so ADOS must put many disputed matters internally only if the vested parties want to listen and not to be dragged and prolonged to the Civil Courts by sort of learned lawyers for hidden agenda especially with last minute withdrawal at the Federal Court. Maybe we need to have a now Diocesan Chancellor and the ADOS land registrar to put all the records in proper order.
5, Even the bank account of the ADOS is illegal with the name “Diocese of Sabah” when it should be “Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee)”.
With the latest announcement by the ADOS's diocesan secretary, Timmie Liew as attached to the ASC Sunday's bulletin on 22nd February, 2015 on the appointment of Tais as Bishop of Sabah, here is my motion ---
The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu Motion 1-- The Mother Church - All Saints’ Cathedral must make sure that the appointed new 6th Bishop of Sabah be done legally within the Constitutions of Diocese of Sabah and Provincial Constitution of Anglican Church in South East Asia for the protection of all assets of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah Rational:- 1.1 Going by the sort of undesirable arguments and developments by the learned Counsel and team of advisors acting for the Bishop of Sabah and Archbishop in two civil suits since 2012 and ended on 24 November, 2104, any thing could be possible including Res Judicata and "non-legal entity". We must put the legality of the 6th Bishop of Sabah -Registered Trustee in proper perspective. 1.2 Which House of Bishop, when Bishop is singular? Can it be House of Bishop of Canterbury? House of Bishops of SEA Province? or remotely possible "House of Bishop" of Sabah? According to the not updated Certificate of Incorporation of the Trustees (Incorporation) Ordinance Sabah Cap 148, the name as incorporated under the name of Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), but according the Conditions attached thereof was in Condition 6 that Bishop of Sabah be appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and in the case of Albert CF Vun, he was appointed by the sort of once “non-legal” entity APSEA and that Archbishop of “non-legal” entity APSEA. We must make this beyond all doubts legally and avoid any challenge for the 6th Bishop of Sabah. 1.3. Several titles I had seen is owned by the Bishop of Sabah while a land transaction done by the Keningau lawyer was right to show the owner as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). The lawyer acting for Albert Vun did state this but had he informed the late exBishop of Sabah? 1.4 The full ramifications (legal, religious and spiritual) could arise if the proper House of Bishop is not defined and ASC be under an illegal Bishop of Sabah with grave consequences when the 6th Bishop is once again challenged to perform. He may declare himself an "illegal" Bishop and free to do as he likes with the prerogative power still in the ADOS constitution. 1.5 God is the God of order and so ADOS must put many disputed matters internally only if the vested parties want to listen and not to be dragged and prolonged to the Civil Courts by sort of learned lawyers for hidden agenda especially with last minute withdrawal at the Federal Court. Maybe we need to have a new Diocesan Chancellor and the ADOS Diocesan registrar to put all the records in proper order. 1.6 Even the bank account of the ADOS is illegal with the name “Diocese of Sabah” when it should be “Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee)”. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 2. We need a new Dean for the ASC to move forward with restoration post the crisis previous Dean Albert CF Vun. Rational:- 1.1 It is more than two years Dean Chak had failed ASC in many ways especially lack of leadership. 1.2 He was caught to follow the irresponsible instructions of ex Bishop Vun especially in the appointment of church volunteers/lay readers and the elections of office bearers. 1.3 Dean Chak did not make any effort to answer to my many questions and comments since he assumed office of Dean in late December, 2012. 1.4 Dean Chak failed to make the proper procedures to enable the Annual Accounts of ASC for year 2013 to be approved by the AGM in March 2014 and then the EGM in June 2014. 1.5 Dean Chak failed to get the approval of the important motions - some with errors - at the EGM held in February, 2014 when such motions were doomed to fail abin ito. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 3. The Solicitor Ronny Cham and his team of legal supporters must explain to Anglican Diocese of Sabah especially All Saints’ Cathedral why he had withdrawn his notice application of Appeal to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014 at the last minute in Court and if deemed appropriate he should apologise to all Christians especially Anglicans. Rational:- 3.1 Ronny Cham was the lawyer in two legal suits acting for Albert CF Vun in the first one and then for the Bolly Lapok in the second but both on the matters of Albert CF Vun. 3.2 Ronny Cham was also advised by the ADOS Chancellor cum the Chairman of the Archbishop Advisory Board Stephen Foo and ex Diocese Chancellor Kenneth Thien. 3.3 Based on the Article in Daily Express of 6th March, 2014, following the first ruling by the High Court on 29th January, 2014, Ronny as the defendant lawyer brought up the issue of Res Judicata of my civil suit against Albert CF Vun earlier. Can this be a “perjury” when he was aware my case was not heard or judged but simply struck out? Can this be “perjury” when it is irrelevant as the defendants in the two cases are different persons? 3.4 Ronny Cham and his team were so confident to stick to the “illegal identity” when it was mentioned in Catholic context as “As far as the law is concerned, each diocese is a separate legal entity, incorporated in the states where it operates. Generally speaking, they are organized as what’s known as a corporation sole—a legal corporation wholly controlled by the individual bishop rather than a board of directors. Yet with “illegal identity”, APSEA could proceed to Federal Court, an irony indeed. 3.5 Several ingredients of both civil suits during and post-events are likely “Contempt of Court” if pursued. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 4. Ronny Cham and team as the legal of the defendant in the APSEA case must advise that the Archbishop must implement the compliance of the Appeal Court’s decisions which reversed the rulings of the High Court by releasing the PAC Report of 2012 on Albert CF Vun and proceed to conduct the Ecclesiastical Court or E-Court without fail. Rational;- 4.1 Court of Appeal held on 23rd May 2014 ruled as follows:- 4.1(a) that the HOB is to forthwith produce to the Appellant and to file into court a copy of the complete Report AND Recommendations of the PAC dated 27.08.2012; 4.1(b) that the HOB is to refer the complaints against BAV to the Ecclesiastical Court within 30 days from the date of the Order; 4.2 Instead of compliance of 4.1, Ronny Cham appealed by filing a notice of appeal to the Federal Court. 4.3 to avoid going back to civil courts, the Archbishop must know the consequences. 4.4 This case had largely affected All Saints’ Cathedral (Dean) vis-a-vis ADOS (bishop) in dual roles of conflict and abuses of prerogatives Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... ( subject to amendment Date:
The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu Motion 1-- The Mother Church - All Saints’ Cathedral must make sure that the appointed new 6th Bishop of Sabah be done legally within the Constitutions of Diocese of Sabah and Provincial Constitution of Anglican Church in South East Asia for the protection of all assets of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah Rational:- 1.1 Going by the sort of undesirable arguments and developments by the learned Counsel and team of advisors acting for the Bishop of Sabah and Archbishop in two civil suits since 2012 and ended on 24 November, 2104, any thing could be possible including Res Judicata and "non-legal entity". We must put the legality of the 6th Bishop of Sabah -Registered Trustee in proper perspective. 1.2 Which House of Bishop, when Bishop is singular? Can it be House of Bishop of Canterbury? House of Bishops of SEA Province? or remotely possible "House of Bishop" of Sabah? According to the not updated Certificate of Incorporation of the Trustees (Incorporation) Ordinance Sabah Cap 148, the name as incorporated under the name of Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), but according the Conditions attached thereof was in Condition 6 that Bishop of Sabah be appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury and in the case of Albert CF Vun, he was appointed by the sort of once “non-legal” entity APSEA and that Archbishop of “non-legal” entity APSEA. We must make this beyond all doubts legally and avoid any challenge for the 6th Bishop of Sabah. 1.3. Several titles I had seen is owned by the Bishop of Sabah while a land transaction done by the Keningau lawyer was right to show the owner as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). The lawyer acting for Albert Vun did state this but had he informed the late exBishop of Sabah? 1.4 The full ramifications (legal, religious and spiritual) could arise if the proper House of Bishop is not defined and ASC be under an illegal Bishop of Sabah with grave consequences when the 6th Bishop is once again challenged to perform. He may declare himself an "illegal" Bishop and free to do as he likes with the prerogative power still in the ADOS constitution. 1.5 God is the God of order and so ADOS must put many disputed matters internally only if the vested parties want to listen and not to be dragged and prolonged to the Civil Courts by sort of learned lawyers for hidden agenda especially with last minute withdrawal at the Federal Court. Maybe we need to have a new Diocesan Chancellor and the ADOS Diocesan registrar to put all the records in proper order. 1.6 Even the bank account of the ADOS is illegal with the name “Diocese of Sabah” when it should be “Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee)”. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 2. We need a new Dean for the ASC to move forward with restoration post the crisis previous Dean Albert CF Vun. Rational:- 1.1 It is more than two years Dean Chak had failed ASC in many ways especially lack of leadership. 1.2 He was caught to follow the irresponsible instructions of ex Bishop Vun especially in the appointment of church volunteers/lay readers and the elections of office bearers. 1.3 Dean Chak did not make any effort to answer to my many questions and comments since he assumed office of Dean in late December, 2012. 1.4 Dean Chak failed to make the proper procedures to enable the Annual Accounts of ASC for year 2013 to be approved by the AGM in March 2014 and then the EGM in June 2014. 1.5 Dean Chak failed to get the approval of the important motions - some with errors - at the EGM held in February, 2014 when such motions were doomed to fail abin ito. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 3. The Solicitor Ronny Cham and his team of legal supporters must explain to Anglican Diocese of Sabah especially All Saints’ Cathedral why he had withdrawn his notice application of Appeal to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014 at the last minute in Court and if deemed appropriate he should apologise to all Christians especially Anglicans. Rational:- 3.1 Ronny Cham was the lawyer in two legal suits acting for Albert CF Vun in the first one and then for the Bolly Lapok in the second but both on the matters of Albert CF Vun. 3.2 Ronny Cham was also advised by the ADOS Chancellor cum the Chairman of the Archbishop Advisory Board Stephen Foo and ex Diocese Chancellor Kenneth Thien. 3.3 Based on the Article in Daily Express of 6th March, 2014, following the first ruling by the High Court on 29th January, 2014, Ronny as the defendant lawyer brought up the issue of Res Judicata of my civil suit against Albert CF Vun earlier. Can this be a “perjury” when he was aware my case was not heard or judged but simply struck out? Can this be “perjury” when it is irrelevant as the defendants in the two cases are different persons? 3.4 Ronny Cham and his team were so confident to stick to the “illegal identity” when it was mentioned in Catholic context as “As far as the law is concerned, each diocese is a separate legal entity, incorporated in the states where it operates. Generally speaking, they are organized as what’s known as a corporation sole—a legal corporation wholly controlled by the individual bishop rather than a board of directors. Yet with “illegal identity”, APSEA could proceed to Federal Court, an irony indeed. 3.5 Several ingredients of both civil suits during and post-events are likely “Contempt of Court” if pursued. Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... The Secretary, All Saints Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu 4. Ronny Cham and team as the legal of the defendant in the APSEA case must advise that the Archbishop must implement the compliance of the Appeal Court’s decisions which reversed the rulings of the High Court by releasing the PAC Report of 2012 on Albert CF Vun and proceed to conduct the Ecclesiastical Court or E-Court without fail. Rational;- 4.1 Court of Appeal held on 23rd May 2014 ruled as follows:- 4.1(a) that the HOB is to forthwith produce to the Appellant and to file into court a copy of the complete Report AND Recommendations of the PAC dated 27.08.2012; 4.1(b) that the HOB is to refer the complaints against BAV to the Ecclesiastical Court within 30 days from the date of the Order; 4.2 Instead of compliance of 4.1, Ronny Cham appealed by filing a notice of appeal to the Federal Court. 4.3 to avoid going back to civil courts, the Archbishop must know the consequences. 4.4 This case had largely affected All Saints’ Cathedral (Dean) vis-a-vis ADOS (bishop) in dual roles of conflict and abuses of prerogatives Proposed by: Seconded by .................................... .................................................... Joshua Y. C. Kong Date:.......................... ( subject to amendment Date:
what is this Res Judicata in the Daily Express of 6th March, 2014
Anonymous8 June 2014 at 08:00
From
the beginning, the HOB should not even had tired to defend themselves
using their non legal entity status then put up all the lies to say they
are under the archbishop of Cantebury. We all know that was not
factually correct. How their counsel managed to twist thru the facts?
Whatever it is praise the Lord, God has redeemed us!We have gotten the PAC report as a public document from the High Court. The whole world judged the case. The real truth had been unfolded. The church has to go thru the refiner's fire.
http://allsaintscathedralsabah.blogspot.com/2014/06/we-declare-victory-for-lord-and-message.html#comment-form
May 27, 2014 - 9:06 am Interesting
Something is not clear-who is RC’s client Bolly or AV? The appeal case was against Bolly but how come the lawyer did not even know where Bolly lives? Who fed RC all those information then? Something is not right!
Yes the dateline given by the Court of Appeal was 30 days from the date of Judgement which expires today 23rd June 2014, but the HOB had on 20th June 2014 filed a Notice of Motion for leave to appeal to the Federal Court through their Solicitors, Messrs Ronny Chan Co. They had also applied for an extension of time of 21 days from the date of the Order granting leave to file and serve the Notice of Appeal. THis is their legal right to do so. We just need to have more patience.
http://thetrutheng.com/2014/05/25/appeal-court-ordered-hob-to-convene-ecclesiastical-court/
Any good lawyer to advise here?
see the Daily Express Article of 6th March, 2014 below.
see also here---http://thetrutheng.com/2014/03/06/daily-express-reports-on-the-lawsuit/
Sunday, February 22, 2015
What is the 6th Bishop Tais going to deal with this BISHOPGATE?
The installation is wasting and worthless if the unsettled matters are swept under the carpet as title and positions are so important rather than serve God in the truth and the spirit.
The 6th Bishop of Sabah has a very heavy duty after the very much unsettled BISHOPGATE - the sole sin of AVCF.
Don't find the excuse as the Vicar General since August, 2014.
The 6th Bishop of Sabah has a very heavy duty after the very much unsettled BISHOPGATE - the sole sin of AVCF.
Don't find the excuse as the Vicar General since August, 2014.
Friday, February 20, 2015
who are these names, and please let me know
This post has attracted many visit to this blog.
who are the following persons:-
Liew King Fah, Voo Foo Jin, S. K. Pang and K. H. Chiew in the context of a story of a land deal in Tawau??
Is there a "fake" will?
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Joshua Kong’s 3 motions
Please prepare your points here and support these 3 motions. TQ Joshua 20/2/2015
Joshua Kong’s motions to All Saints’ Cathedral AGM on 29 March, 2015
1. We need a new Dean for the ASC to move forward with restoration post the crisis previous Dean Albert CF Vun.
Rational:-
1.1 It is more than two years Dean Chak had failed ASC in many ways especially lack of leadership.
1.2 He was caught to follow the irresponsible instructions of ex Bishop Vun especially in the appointment of church volunteers/lay readers and the elections of office bearers.
1.3 Dean Chak did not make any effort to answer to my many questions and comments since he assumed office of Dean in late December, 2012.
1.4 Dean Chak failed to make the proper procedures to enable the Annual Accounts of
ASC for year 2013 to be approved by the AGM in March 2014 and then the EGM in June 2014.
1.5 Dean Chak failed to get the approval of the important motions - some with errors - at the EGM held in February, 2014 when such motions were doomed to fail abin ito.
Proposed by: Seconded by
.................................... ....................................................
Joshua Y. C. Kong
Date:..........................
2. Ronny Cham and his team of legal support must explain to Anglican Diocese of Sabah especially All Saints’ Cathedral why he had withdrawn his notice application of Appeal to the Federal Court [just minute before the hearing] on 24th November 2014 and if deemed appropriate he should apologise to all Christians especially Anglicans.
Rational:-
2.1 Ronny Cham was the lawyer in two legal suits acting for Albert CF Vun in the first one and then for the Bolly Lapok in the second but both on the matters of Albert CF Vun.
2.2 Ronny Cham was also advised by the ADOS Chancellor cum the Chairman of the Archbishop Advisory Board Stephen Foo and ex Diocese Chancellor Kenneth Thien.
2.3 Based on the Article in Daily Express of 6th March, 2014, following the first ruling by the High Court on 29th January, 2014, Ronny as the defendant lawyer brought up the issue of Res Judicata of my civil suit against Albert CF vun earlier. Can this be a “perjury” when he was aware my case was not heard or judged but simply struck out? Can this be “perjury” when it is irrelevant as the defendants in the two cases are different persons?
2.4 Ronny Cham and his team were so confident to stick to the “illegal identity” when it was mentioned in Catholic context as “As far as the law is concerned, each diocese is a separate legal entity, incorporated in the states where it operates. Generally speaking, they are organized as what’s known as a corporation sole—a legal corporation wholly controlled by the individual bishop rather than a board of directors. Yet with “illegal identity”, APSEA could proceed to Federal Court, an irony indeed.
2.5 Several ingredients of both civil suits are Contempt of Court if pursued.
Proposed by: Seconded by
.................................... ....................................................
Joshua Y. C. Kong
Date:..........................
3. Ronny Cham and team as the legal of the defendant in the APSEA case must advise that the Archbishop must implement the compliance of the Appeal Court’s decision which reversed the rulings of the High Court by releasing the PAC Report of 2012 on Albert CF Vun and proceed to conduct the Ecclesiastical Court or E-Court without fail.
Rational;-
3.1 Court of Appeal held on 23rd May 2014 ruled as follows:-
3.1(a) that the HOB is to forthwith produce to the Appellant and to file into court a copy of the complete Report AND Recommendations of the PAC dated 27.08.2012;
3.1(b) that the HOB is to refer the complaints against BAV to the Ecclesiastical Court within 90 days from the date of the Order;
3.2 Instead of compliance of 3.1, Ronny Cham appealed by filing a notice of appeal to the Federal Court.
3.3 to avoid going back to civil courts, the Archbishop must know the consequences.
3.4 This case is largely affecting All Saints’ Cathedral (Dean) vis-a-vis ADOS (bishop) in dual roles of conflict and abuses of prerogatives
Proposed by: Seconded by
.................................... ....................................................
Joshua Y. C. Kong
Date:..........................
( subject to amendment or additional points)
Monday, February 16, 2015
Bible verses to comfort all in a time like this
Pray unceasingly and be strong and victorious in God. Claim God's promise in Jesus mighty name.Joshua
2 Chronicle 7: 14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
7 And ye shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.
8 And five of you shall chase an hundred, and an hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight: and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.
U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama’s recent condemnation of medieval Christian history as a way to exonerate Islam
is a reminder of how woefully ignorant (or intentionally deceptive) a
good many people in the West are concerning the true history of
Christian Europe and Islam.
The problem is that those who condemn things like the Crusades—including “mainstream” academics, journalists, movie-makers, and politicians—do so without mention of any historical context. Worse, they imply “we” already know the context: evil popes and greedy knights exploiting Christianity to seize Muslim lands and wealth. Or in the words of Karen Armstrong, “the idea that Islam imposed itself by the sword is a Western fiction, fabricated during the time of the Crusades when, in fact, it was Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam.”
Of course, the true story of Christendom and Islam is antithetically different. Consider some facts for a moment:
A mere decade after the birth of Islam in the 7th century, the jihad burst out of Arabia. Leaving aside all the thousands of miles of ancient lands and civilizations that were permanently conquered—today casually called the “Islamic world,” including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and parts of India and China—much of Europe was also, at one time or another, conquered by the sword of Islam.
Among other nations and territories that were attacked and/or came under Muslim domination are (to give them their modern names in no particular order): Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Sicily, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Greece, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Lithuania, Romania, Albania, Serbia, Armenia, Georgia, Crete, Cyprus, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Belarus, Malta, Sardinia, Moldova, Slovakia, and Montenegro.
In 846 Rome was sacked and the Vatican defiled by Muslim Arab raiders; some 600 years later, in 1453, Christendom’s other great basilica, Holy Wisdom (or Hagia Sophia) was conquered by Muslim Turks, permanently. (Till this day, Turkish Muslims celebrate this day of great rapine and slaughter.)
The few European regions that escaped direct Islamic occupation due to their northwest remoteness include Great Britain, Scandinavia, and Germany. That, of course, does not mean that they were not attacked by Islam. Indeed, in the furthest northwest of Europe, in Iceland, Christians used to pray that God save them from the “terror of the Turk.” This was not mere paranoia; as late as 1627, Muslim corsairs raided the Christian island seizing four hundred captives and selling them in the slave markets of Algiers.
Nor did America escape. A few years after the formation of the United States, in 1800, American trading ships in the Mediterranean were plundered and their sailors enslaved by Muslim corsairs. The ambassador of Tripoli explained to Thomas Jefferson that it was a Muslim’s “right and duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to enslave as many as they could take as prisoners.”
In short, for roughly one millennium—punctuated by a Crusader-rebuttal that the modern West is obsessed with demonizing—Islam daily posed an existential threat to Christian Europe and by extension Western civilization.
And therein lies the rub: Today, whether as taught in high school or graduate school, whether as portrayed by Hollywood or the news media, the predominant historic narrative is that Muslims are the historic “victims” of “intolerant” Western Christians. (Watch my response to a Fox News host asking why Christians have always persecuted Muslims.)
So here we are, paying the price of being an ahistorical society: A
few years after the Islamic strikes of 9/11—merely the latest in the
centuries-long, continents-wide jihad on the West—Americans elected
(twice) a man with a Muslim name and heritage for president; a man who
condemns the Christian Crusades while openly empowering the same ideology that the Crusaders fought for centuries.
Surely the United States’ European forebears—who at one time or another either fought off or were conquered by Islam—must be turning in their graves.
But all this is history, you say? Why rehash it? Why not let it be and move on, begin a new chapter of mutual tolerance and respect, even if history must be “touched up” a bit?
This would be a somewhat plausible position—if not for the fact that, all around the globe, Muslims are still exhibiting the same imperial impulse and intolerant supremacism that their conquering forbears did. The only difference is that the Muslim world is currently incapable of defeating the West through a conventional war.
Yet this may not even be necessary. Thanks to the West’s ignorance of history, Muslims are flooding Europe under the guise of “immigration,” refusing to assimilate, and forming enclaves which in modern parlance are called “ghettoes” but in Islamic terminology are the ribat—frontier posts where the jihad is waged on the infidel, one way or the other.
All this leads to another, perhaps even more important point: If the true history of the West and Islam is being turned upside its head, what other historical “orthodoxies” being peddled around as truth are also false?
Were the Dark Ages truly benighted because of the “suffocating” forces of Christianity? Or were these dark ages—which “coincidentally” occurred during the same centuries when jihad was constantly harrying Europe—a product of another suffocating “religion”?
Was the Spanish Inquisition—also condemned by Obama—a reflection of Christian barbarism or was it a reflection of Christian desperation vis-Ã -vis the hundreds of thousands of Muslims who, while claiming to have converted to Christianity, were practicing taqiyya and living as moles trying to subvert the Christian nation back to Islam?
Don’t expect to get true answers to these and other questions from the makers, guardians, and disseminators of the West’s fabricated epistemology.
In the future (whatever one there may be) the histories written about our times will likely stress how our era, ironically called the “information age,” was not an age when people were so well informed, but rather an age when disinformation was so widespread and unquestioned that generations of people lived in bubbles of alternate realities—till they were finally popped.
*
Don’t miss Shillman Fellow Raymond Ibrahim on The Glazov Gang discuss “ISIS’s Islamic Inspirations”:
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, on YouTube and LIKE it on Facebook.
2 Chronicle 7: 14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
Isaiah 30:17King James Version (KJV)
17 One thousand shall flee at the rebuke of one; at the rebuke of five shall ye flee: till ye be left as a beacon upon the top of a mountain, and as an ensign on an hill.Joshua 23:10King James Version (KJV)
10 One man of you shall chase a thousand: for the Lord your God, he it is that fighteth for you, as he hath promised you.Leviticus 26:6-8King James Version (KJV)
6 And I will give peace in the land, and ye shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid: and I will rid evil beasts out of the land, neither shall the sword go through your land.7 And ye shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.
8 And five of you shall chase an hundred, and an hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight: and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.
Deuteronomy 28:25King James Version (KJV)
25 The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: thou shalt go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them: and shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.The True History of Christendom and Islam
February 13, 2015 by 54 Comments
U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama’s recent condemnation of medieval Christian history as a way to exonerate Islam
is a reminder of how woefully ignorant (or intentionally deceptive) a
good many people in the West are concerning the true history of
Christian Europe and Islam.The problem is that those who condemn things like the Crusades—including “mainstream” academics, journalists, movie-makers, and politicians—do so without mention of any historical context. Worse, they imply “we” already know the context: evil popes and greedy knights exploiting Christianity to seize Muslim lands and wealth. Or in the words of Karen Armstrong, “the idea that Islam imposed itself by the sword is a Western fiction, fabricated during the time of the Crusades when, in fact, it was Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam.”
A mere decade after the birth of Islam in the 7th century, the jihad burst out of Arabia. Leaving aside all the thousands of miles of ancient lands and civilizations that were permanently conquered—today casually called the “Islamic world,” including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and parts of India and China—much of Europe was also, at one time or another, conquered by the sword of Islam.
Among other nations and territories that were attacked and/or came under Muslim domination are (to give them their modern names in no particular order): Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Sicily, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Greece, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Lithuania, Romania, Albania, Serbia, Armenia, Georgia, Crete, Cyprus, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Belarus, Malta, Sardinia, Moldova, Slovakia, and Montenegro.
In 846 Rome was sacked and the Vatican defiled by Muslim Arab raiders; some 600 years later, in 1453, Christendom’s other great basilica, Holy Wisdom (or Hagia Sophia) was conquered by Muslim Turks, permanently. (Till this day, Turkish Muslims celebrate this day of great rapine and slaughter.)
The few European regions that escaped direct Islamic occupation due to their northwest remoteness include Great Britain, Scandinavia, and Germany. That, of course, does not mean that they were not attacked by Islam. Indeed, in the furthest northwest of Europe, in Iceland, Christians used to pray that God save them from the “terror of the Turk.” This was not mere paranoia; as late as 1627, Muslim corsairs raided the Christian island seizing four hundred captives and selling them in the slave markets of Algiers.
Nor did America escape. A few years after the formation of the United States, in 1800, American trading ships in the Mediterranean were plundered and their sailors enslaved by Muslim corsairs. The ambassador of Tripoli explained to Thomas Jefferson that it was a Muslim’s “right and duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to enslave as many as they could take as prisoners.”
In short, for roughly one millennium—punctuated by a Crusader-rebuttal that the modern West is obsessed with demonizing—Islam daily posed an existential threat to Christian Europe and by extension Western civilization.
And therein lies the rub: Today, whether as taught in high school or graduate school, whether as portrayed by Hollywood or the news media, the predominant historic narrative is that Muslims are the historic “victims” of “intolerant” Western Christians. (Watch my response to a Fox News host asking why Christians have always persecuted Muslims.)
Surely the United States’ European forebears—who at one time or another either fought off or were conquered by Islam—must be turning in their graves.
But all this is history, you say? Why rehash it? Why not let it be and move on, begin a new chapter of mutual tolerance and respect, even if history must be “touched up” a bit?
This would be a somewhat plausible position—if not for the fact that, all around the globe, Muslims are still exhibiting the same imperial impulse and intolerant supremacism that their conquering forbears did. The only difference is that the Muslim world is currently incapable of defeating the West through a conventional war.
Yet this may not even be necessary. Thanks to the West’s ignorance of history, Muslims are flooding Europe under the guise of “immigration,” refusing to assimilate, and forming enclaves which in modern parlance are called “ghettoes” but in Islamic terminology are the ribat—frontier posts where the jihad is waged on the infidel, one way or the other.
All this leads to another, perhaps even more important point: If the true history of the West and Islam is being turned upside its head, what other historical “orthodoxies” being peddled around as truth are also false?
Were the Dark Ages truly benighted because of the “suffocating” forces of Christianity? Or were these dark ages—which “coincidentally” occurred during the same centuries when jihad was constantly harrying Europe—a product of another suffocating “religion”?
Was the Spanish Inquisition—also condemned by Obama—a reflection of Christian barbarism or was it a reflection of Christian desperation vis-Ã -vis the hundreds of thousands of Muslims who, while claiming to have converted to Christianity, were practicing taqiyya and living as moles trying to subvert the Christian nation back to Islam?
Don’t expect to get true answers to these and other questions from the makers, guardians, and disseminators of the West’s fabricated epistemology.
In the future (whatever one there may be) the histories written about our times will likely stress how our era, ironically called the “information age,” was not an age when people were so well informed, but rather an age when disinformation was so widespread and unquestioned that generations of people lived in bubbles of alternate realities—till they were finally popped.
*
Don’t miss Shillman Fellow Raymond Ibrahim on The Glazov Gang discuss “ISIS’s Islamic Inspirations”:
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, on YouTube and LIKE it on Facebook.
Ronny Cham and his gang of questioned lawyers should apologise to Anglican churches
Ronny Cham sue all those who defame you because you are good lawyer.
The Truth
Seeking the truth behind Anglican Diocese of Sabah's Crisis
May 26, 2014
Sad, Sad Day http://thetrutheng.com/2014/05/26/sad-sad-sad/comment-page-1/#comment-15616
In fact they have also abdicated the defence of this court case to Bishop Albert Vun. This is a case between an Anglican member versus Archbishop Bolly Lapok who was represented by Ronny Cham. Yet when a judge asked Cham where does the Archbishop reside, Cham could not answer. The plaintiff’s lawyer Roderick Fernandes gave the answer to court. How can Cham not know where his client resides? Lest we accused a senior lawyer of being sloppy, his client is likely to be BAV. The next question is why did Bolly allow BAV to act on behalf of the Province? It fuels the speculation the HOB is in cahoots with BAV. Can we expect the three Bishops to be impartial at the ecclesiastical court?The Truth
Seeking the truth behind Anglican Diocese of Sabah's Crisis
· About
January 5, 2015 http://thetrutheng.com/2015/01/05/hob-conceded-finally/
HOB Conceded Finally
We are glad that the legal case we took up against the House of Bishops (HOB) is finally behind us, after the Counsel for HOB, Ronny Cham withdrew the Motion for leave to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014. It was also agreed that there will be no order for Cost in the Federal Court. This means the case is finally closed.
Finally, the HOB accepted that it had lost the case and could not win at the Federal Court after the Court of Appeal gave its judgment against them in May. This is a wise decision on their part, because going forward may cost them more financially and bring greater humiliation if they lost again. This decision, although made at the last minute before the Federal Court started to hear its application, may be the most intelligent decision they made in this crisis.
We have yet to receive the refund of cost paid by us, amounting to RM 15,000.00 after the High Court awarded cost to the Defendant. When the judgment was overturned on appeal to the Court of Appeal, the Defendant was ordered to refund us the money. In addition, the Defendant was also ordered to pay cost for the High Court and Court of Appeal proceedings amounting to RM30,000.00. These claims are long overdue. However, Ronny Cham had given our lawyer his word that HOB will settle the debt. Once these claims are received, we will write up the account and honor the pledge on how the fund shall be utilized. They have up to 7th December 2014 to pay the sum of RM 45,000.00 or else contempt action will be taken against them.
We had fought a good fight and we want to take this opportunity to thank our lawyer and our plaintiffs for their sacrifices. We also want to thank all who had support us in this cause, financially, with prayers and with encouragements. We thank God for His Grace to let truth be established and revealed. Let it be a lesson to all who are in authority that no one is above the law.
Legal Action Task Force
Share this:
· Twitter
·
Related
4 comments
What say Stephen Foo who decided to go on and on? Why stop now???
2.
3.
Dear The Truth,
5.
Can it be make possible to post on the investigations, findings & recommendation done to HBO on the wholesale abuses
of BAV ( 40 abuses ) soon ?
ADOS parishioners has the absolute rights to know nothing but all the truth on the abuses done by the late BAV.
On behalf of my group, I thank you sincerely for an excellent job done, without this channel, things would have been swept under the carpet & ADOS would has gone bust by now.
of BAV ( 40 abuses ) soon ?
ADOS parishioners has the absolute rights to know nothing but all the truth on the abuses done by the late BAV.
On behalf of my group, I thank you sincerely for an excellent job done, without this channel, things would have been swept under the carpet & ADOS would has gone bust by now.
6.
7.
The disputed items of income – Fixed Deposit Interest and Properties Rental
9.
Michael Tong, who succeeded Paul Chong as the Honorary Treasurer of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah from the year of 2012, had responded to the widespread criticism of church leaders’ dishonest behavior and acted “appropriately” by disclosing the Fixed Deposit Interest and Rental Income for the years of 2012 and 2013.
10.
He might have realized the serious consequences he has to face up if a conduct in which there is a design of an ulterior motive to commit deceit of the church funds is uncovered. His positive response, possibly due to professional ethics, has reflected the leadership’s recognition that it needs to improve governance, transparency and respond to public opinion.
11.
The aforementioned income and that of Year 2010 and Year 2011 is given below for public information:
(A) Interest Income from Fixed Deposit at an average sum of RM35,000,000.00
Year 2012 – RM 926,226 / Year 2013 – RM876, 471
Year 2010 – RM 356,482 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00
(A) Interest Income from Fixed Deposit at an average sum of RM35,000,000.00
Year 2012 – RM 926,226 / Year 2013 – RM876, 471
Year 2010 – RM 356,482 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00
12.
(B) Rental Income from Diocesan’s properties
Year 2012 – RM 468,036 / Year 2013 – RM456, 398
Year 2010 – RM 0.00 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00
Year 2012 – RM 468,036 / Year 2013 – RM456, 398
Year 2010 – RM 0.00 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00
13.
The above comparison has revealed a fact that may cause suspicion upon church leaders’ integrity. Church members are inclined to ask the following questions:
1. Why did the church receive only RM356, 482 as fixed deposit interest income for Year 2010? What was the prevailing interest rate in that year?
2. There was no fixed deposits interest received for Year 2011. Were there any special arrangements with the banks for the sum of RM35,000,000 placed with them?
3. Why did the church not receive any rental income for the years of 2010 and 2011?
4. Can Michael Tong release more details about the relevant income for the period from Year 2006 to Year 2009?
1. Why did the church receive only RM356, 482 as fixed deposit interest income for Year 2010? What was the prevailing interest rate in that year?
2. There was no fixed deposits interest received for Year 2011. Were there any special arrangements with the banks for the sum of RM35,000,000 placed with them?
3. Why did the church not receive any rental income for the years of 2010 and 2011?
4. Can Michael Tong release more details about the relevant income for the period from Year 2006 to Year 2009?
14.
Perhaps, there are some other reasons that we do not know about and we need church leaders’ explanation.
15.
16.
The maze-like Financial Report of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah
18.
“Did Michael Tong rectify the past years’ accounting errors prior to his preparation of the Diocesan’s Financial Statements for Year 2012 and 2013?” This is the question that has been repeatedly asked by church members — solely due to the leaders’ lies and deception which have shattered their trust in them.
19.
Some of the accounting errors, which should be more appropriately regarded as “intentional mistakes” , were allegedly designed to siphon out church money , have aroused a great deal of church members’ interest in finding out how the entries involving the lost of more than 10 millions of Ringgit were posted in the ledgers.
20.
For example, the late Bishop Vun, believed to have been misled and instilled with a sense of superiority by the Standing Committee, had blatantly violated the Diocesan’s Constitution by acquiring properties in Thailand and registered under private ownership. Not only did they went against the Constitution which does not allow them to buy properties outside Sabah and Labuan, they had for unknown reason posted the relevant entries under expenses instead of fixed assets in the ledger. Did the acquisition, which was factually transacted against the normal procedure, constitute any criminal offence?
21.
Unless there is a persuasive explanation that would justify this disputed issue, church members have every reason to believe that church leaders are dressing their unethical schemes under the guise of doing missionary work.
22.
23.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
25.
No through road, first the auditors for ADOS for 2012 and 2103 is unconstitutional as it is not honorary and so the precedence of illegalities aplenty of AVCF had been perpetrated like criminals. (please read the ADOS Constitution). Don’t expect anyone to do justice to the accounts after the rottenness since 2006. All those in the standing committee should be charged for criminal offence. Let them come forward now.
26.
27.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
29.
With this milestone case, ADoS much impact a sea change to the Province of Anglican Churches in South East Asia by transformation in concept, structure, supervision and management of the affairs of the church as a better vehicle to bring back the confidence of the public at large. Whatever happened in the past had been shrouded with secrecy and hidden agenda.
Ronny Cham and his gang of questioned lawyers should apologise to Anglican churches.We are glad that the legal case we took up against the House of Bishops (HOB) is finally behind us, after the Counsel for HOB, Ronny Cham withdrew the Motion for leave to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014. It was also agreed that there will be no order for Cost in the Federal Court. This means the case is finally closed
RC had withdrawn the application for notice of Appeal in the Federal Court on 24 Nov., 2014 and so he and his gang must publish an apology to the Christians and Anglicans for the disrepute to all.
Even when Albert (his defacto client) was not around since July, 2014, he made no effort to stop the rot since then but chose to drag on until Nov 2014 when all the way since 2012, the rottenness of Albert was known.
Ronny chose to ignore that even with my laborious suit against Albert in July, 2012 when his modus operandi was known.
So Ronny Cham ask your client Bolly Lapok to release what the High Court or later the Appeal court had dealt with - all the rubbish of Albert - to be exposed for proper cleansing and not to be swept under the carpet.
Ronny, you should know what is Contempt of Court and how can an article by Stephen Foo appear in Daily Express on 6th March, when the content is deemed a CoC. Apply to the Court to redeem yourself and your gang in this CoC so that you all can find some peace in JAIL. Bring with you Bolly Lapok as well and that is true justice to Christians.
I will move a motion in ASC AGM on 29 March, 2015.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)