ADOS is the real loser in both civil suits.

Another item of technicality that my case against Albert Vun was wrong party. If we study the Appeal Court's Judgement of Archbishop case, Bolly was ruled a valid defendant as he was in control of APSEA although APSEA has a Constitution. So likewise Albert Vun was in control of ADOS, and so where got "wrong party"? Dear Anglicans, If we scrutinise the Government Proceeding Act and the terms thereof and the Bishop of Sabah wanted to claim protection from that Act as consent needs to be granted by the AG for two plaintiffs. On the other hand like any law is a double edged sword, and if the Bishop has failed under that Act as his appointment is by the TYT, the State AG must file a case against the Bishop for failure to discharge his duty of Trust as a Registered Trustee. My counsel did ask the State AG if he wanted to pursue the prosecution but that was turned down for known agenda. So the State AG also failed. So there is grave injustice when I lost the locus standi to pursue my case as simply GPA. So Bishop continued to flourish in his crimes until he disappeared on 15 July, 2014. Any one got anything to add? We need to set up a commission of truth.