205. Coup de tat for ADOS

We cannot allow the crimes-laden bishop to assume office even with socalled rotten symbol of Feet washing Ceremony as a worst insult to God in our All Saints' Cathedral.

We cannot allow a person with crimes-laden habits to be the trustee of the ADOS.  The State AG should act on this without any prompting from the members as the TYT is seriously insulted to have appointed a liar and a proven criminal to be a trustee (now we know).

We cannot let the Provincial House of Bishops in SEA to get away with 'murders' by a fellow socalled bishop of the worst records in ADOS.

We also cannot allow a bishop's Commissary to be another recalcitrant in dealing with the BISHOPGATE.

We cannot allow a mediator or facilitator who had not done his work properly without a proper report to allow a sort of very much questioned solution to BISHOPGATE with FWC.

Where is the full report for the forced Sabbatical leave on the crimes-laden bishop?

As a recommendation, all the Bishops in Provincial House of Bishops of SEA and commissary and facilitators should be sent to the Bukit Padang Mesra Hospital for proper checking.


In the meanwhile ADOS or Anglican Churches in Sabah should be re-invented and control taken over by the qualified lay leaders and we can do away with all the prevailing clergies and pastors in the feather of the same flock under AVCF.

So lets start with a new beginning on 1st August, 2013.

Joshua Kong
 

204. An issue of ethic

An issue of ethic for a crimes-laden bishop to be defended

This is indeed a pressing issue possibly coming out from some legal fraternity.

What do the lawyers feel about this case of defending the crimes-laden bishop?

What do the parishioners and congregation feel if the crimes-laden bishop be allowed to be defended in a Court of laws by any lawyer?

What about the lawyers feel that a crimes-laden bishop be protected by another set of laws which itself can be questioned?  Why cannot the bishop defend himself if he is so clean as he claims?

For most lawyers, is it really a business at work?

A bishop may be a different case if when we want to wrap up all things together with other criminals.  Is this really so?

Do you think the lawyers have any conscience at all by defending a crimes-laden bishop?

By defending the case of the crimes-laden as a business, the lawyers are getting a quick rewards in cash and in kind and in this case how would the Bishop get his cash to pay up the lawyers?  In this case the lawyers concerned got the rewards in kind by the moral victory by defending the crimes-laden bishop.  Every thing is written on the wall.

I also heard that the crimes-laden bishop had been visiting Thailand despite on forced Sabbatical leaves and for what business is he there?  This rumours of his visits to Thailand must be cleared as money of the church sent there has yet to be returned the Anglican Diocese of Sabah. 

We must know how did the crimes-laden Bishop afford to pay for the hefty fees charged by the lawyers.  Did the crimes-laden bishop use the tithes/fund of the church to pay for the fees to defend his crimes already proven beyond doubt?  If so, we must get to the root of this payment.

Someone had described the whole crisis as “the bishop is spending the blood and sweat money of the members for his pleasure”.

Does it really bring sort of shame that the defending lawyers are Christians including a  senior pastor of an independent church in City Mall?  How would this bring aura and prestige to the Christian communities when crimes-laden bishop can be defended blindly?

I want those who read this article of mine, pray about this.

It is now almost 6 months up for the forced Sabbatical leave and the crimes-laden bishop is likely back to business as usual with more oomph to steal after the feet washing by some people on some people on 19^th July, 2013.  How can this crimes-laden bishop come back after a crisis without giving any report by the parties concerned?

I have been busy with several other matters to complete my book – BISHOPGATE IN ANGLICAN SABAH – a case of crimes-laden bishop”. This crime is contagious and affects all other bishops and the Anglican Communion.

Hopefully by August, 2013, my paper to ITCCS would be ready.

203. ITCCS

The FACTS of AVCF speak much much LOUDER than anything and we need to work on this ---
quote from thetruthasc.wordpress  http://thetrutheng.com/2013/08/04/a-homecoming-party/

August 13, 2013 - 10:09 am WWJD

HOW TO FORCE BAV TO RESIGN?
So far, there has been no corrective action from the HOB; no satisfaction from the criminal/civil courts; and BAV has stubbornly refused to be shamed into resigning.
Someone has suggested taking the issue to ITCCS (International Tribunal on Church Crimes and Security). But I seriously doubt if anything will come of it any time soon.
So how do we force BAV to resign?

What a great blessing indeed for me challenging AVCF in the Civil Courts?
Since my shortlived Court case ended with just struck out giving the moral victory to the defendants lawyers and dubious legal advisors, nobody has done anything to nail AVCF despite so much talk in the public forums and in private conversation that there are some people out there with iron-clad scenario to nail AVCF to the floor and not to the cross which is reserved to Jesus Christ only.
Would anyone like to help me to refile my case to the Civil Court?
I am wondering why there are so many talks of action of all sorts but nothing has surfaced so far. Why so scared? You all know we are fighting against the forces of darkness and the principalities of the evil ones. The BLOOD of Jesus would take care of any further challenge as we are doing for Christ’s sake.
Since I have yet survived again, I would not mind to proceed what I have started to do by lodging a formal complaint to the International Tribunal on Church Crimes and Security or ITCCS.
This complaint is boosted by the recent very high profile of the abdicated Pope Bernard XVI being pursued by ITCCS for his ‘covert’ crimes on cover up of the crimes committed by his subordinates.
So with my effort to ITCCS, the whole Anglican Communion including the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Primates of the Province in South East Asia could be summoned to testify for their crimes and the ‘heinous’ crimes of AVCF.
So any Anglican is prepared to assist me to present a powerful Statement of Claims against all the primates not animals in the Borneo forests?
May I hear from you before this goes viral soon.
God bless you all,
Joshua Y C Kong
6013-8394513