Saturday, August 30, 2014

Synod of 2014 is illegal - shameful

http://thetrutheng.com/2014/08/30/the-legality-of-the-2014-synod/comment-page-1/#comment-12859




Another fatal illegal act is on the audited accounts of ADOS as the commercial audit firm doing what should be done by HONORARY auditor —
Michael Tong has definitely advised wrongly especially he did not comply with the Diocesan’s Constitution to appoint an “HONORARY” AUDITOR for 2012, and 2013.
The Constitution of Diocese of Sabah states in Article IX (7) – Procedure in the Diocesan Synod – “At each ordinary meeting of the Diocesan Synod, an honorary auditor shall be appointed who shall remain in office until the conclusion of the ordinary meeting of the Diocesan Synod and shall be eligible for re-appointment.” [ the audited accounts cannot be approved for two reasons namely the accounts of 2010 and 2011 were not re-audited and accounts of 2012 and 2013 as audited are unconstitutional and nobody can over rule this].

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

ruling of High Court

 I wonder how can Ronny used the term " Res Judicata" for this case when my case in High Court was never heard or tried properly except strike out under unusual circumstances.  Joshua





this was changed by Appeal Court on 23/5/2014

RULING_-OS-BKI-24-170.8-2013_-_CLARENCE_FU_V._HSE_OF_BISHOP.pdf

Sunday, August 24, 2014

7th Message to the delegates of Synod and members of Anglican Diocese of Sabah ADOS.

Tais Melter  had lied at the public dialogue at ASC on 16th October 2012 in the sanctity of the.God’s house.

What does the Bible say If you lose or loose on earth for God, then you lose Heaven.



7th Message to the delegates of Synod and members of Anglican Diocese of Sabah ADOS.



Dean Chak of All Saints Cathedral wrote a message title GRACE in the Cathedral bulletin of 24th August, 2014 exactly one week before the ADOS Synod congress 2014.



Quote from the last paragraph of that message “Let past the past and let God’s grace handle the future.  The future belongs to the Lord. God says, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.”



As there is no Bishop and no Vicar General, I hope this is not the theme of the ADOS Synod 2014.  If it is the theme and key message then it is very sad for the Anglican Church stuck in the very muddy pool of shit of Albert Vun Cheong Fui – the ex Bishop.



What did the son Samuel say on behalf of the “dead” Bishop?  He said with a grudge in his heart that his father had forgiven all you people in his eulogy at the funeral.  If that is the case, why did not Albert say it himself in his socalled “last sermon” also shown in the “preaching” video at his own funeral at ASC.  The son saying it is irrelevant



So we are all heading for an important Synod 2014 which can break or make the Anglican Church into the future as God’s Grace can work two or more ways.



We all know that Albert when he was in office, he used to blame others especially the Standing Committee and the Diocesan Chancellor for his action.  There are also fingers pointing at the Standcom or the Synods for the massive failure of Albert.



So based on the Dean’s message and if most people agree to it, are the Standcom and the Synod to bear the brunt of Albert forever when we know the sin was piling up to the heaven.  You think God likes the “perfume” of those sinful acts in ADOS? 



You all believe that the grace of God would deal with those rotten things without those responsible repenting and put right what had been wrong.



Spiritual and secular matters are inter-related if anyone had done wrong as the black marks are recorded in us as like an iguana has a cut in its tail for every chicken killed and eaten.  We need to go to God in the image of God in the light.



So are the Standcom and Synod prepared to carry those alleged black marks themselves to the next world without dealing with them now.   I think there would not be intimidating “crocodile tears” at the start of the Synod if to be held.



If Grace is sufficient, why then ASC could not find a suitable honorary auditor for 2013 for the first time until it is still a mess with the accounts for 2013 yet to be approved even done by a sort of professional firm also with conflict.



If Grace is sufficient, why was not the ADOS audited accounts for 2010 and 2011 yet to be re-audited as promised after the alleged “frauds” in those accounts.  How do we account to God for His money?

If Grace is sufficient, why no honorary auditor can take up the job in ADOS for the accounts of 2012 and 2013 when it is unconstitutional for an audit firm to do it.  As a principle, 2012 and 2013 accounts cannot be audited when the accounts of 2010 and 2011 were very much questioned.



Recently the Putatan Chamber of Commerce was de-registered by the Registrar of Society for their accounts were not properly endorsed by two former auditors.



While we are not under the Societies Act, is it God’s grace that ADOS and ASC be “liquidated” according to the proper Order of God?  Should we go on handling the accounts of God in Anglican Church with the elements of hanky panky and still be OK?



God’s grace is sufficient for us to continue sinning and let the blood of Jesus go on washing clean and be good disciples of God.  Remember, what Jesus did in His temple of unsightly activities?



Based on the message of Dean Chak, it would go on with the rottenness of ADOS endless hoping “let the past the past” like “let the dead bury the dead.”



When this rotten scenario is continued, don’t expect God to withhold His wrath on us.



This brings me to some examples of the Wrath in All Saints Cathedral and ADOS in the past and now coming in a grand style which we cannot afford to ignore.



I am not going into the details why the youngest brother of the two bishops passed away also with cancer in early this millennium.  That was the wrath of God.  We need to sit down for this sharing.



Dean Herbert should share why he had to resign as Dean of ASC and even decided to join another private church. He got himself in an entanglement of sort and was talking nonsense in anger from the pulpit. That was the wrath of God.



Then soon after the “disappearance” of Albert  in July 2014 also blamed on cancer but outlived his two months since October, 2013, his brother Mike went to the next world so soon.  Isn’t that Wrath of God too?



There have been plenty of warnings of Wrath of God and anything can happen now.



Another wrath of God is that Stephen Foo on 23rd July, 2012 in front of John Yeo, K Thien, possibly Yong T C and another priest in the Wisma Anglican’s library declared that I did not have God.  I rebutted Foo that if I did not have God, I would not be standing there to serve the Writ of Summon against Albert and survive till today when many have been praying that God would deal with me for two years now.



Continue to serve God in the truth and the spirit, I would expect the delegates of the Synod unless it is called off in the last minute would be likely great disappointment as those delegates were largely “appointed” under the cultic Albert.  Who would be in the Standcom to venture for a new beginning of the ADOS?  Would most of the incumbent members be retained from the same crop of largely silent “delegates”?



How can the illegal audited accounts of ADOS by an accounting firm and not HONORARY auditor be presented to the Synod?  By virtue of this message, the Archbishop of the “non legal entity” APSEA could face the Wrath of God in some ways if the accounts are presented to be approved.



If Dean Chak had suggested that the “let past the past” to applied to the Synod and ADOS, we fear everything would be further exposed as so much had already been exposed. 



The Synod 2014 has nothing much to boast except to set up the professional Commission of Truth and Re-construction.  Only then can ADOS move on otherwise the existence of ADOS is very much questioned.



Brothers and sisters in Christ, I do not quote any Biblical verse here but my writing is biblical based.  So be blessed by the burden that the Wrath and Grace of God would deal with us.



Joshua Y. C. Kong    24 August, 2014 a belated birthday message.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

6th Message to the Synod of Anglican Diocese of Sabah (ADOS) 2014 and Anglican members



6th Message to the Synod of Anglican Diocese of Sabah (ADOS) 2014 and Anglican members



Since May, 2014 God gave me a burden to make an impression on the Synod delegates to consider the interest of God’s church and His wealth for our blessing.  Needless for me to go through the crimes of AVCF now that he is sort of “disappear” from the ADOS.



In this message, I would remind the delegates to be always conscious of the interests of God in His church.





In this message it is focus on the assets of God especially the sale of church land in Likas of 13.86 acres for RM31m and the direction of ADOS now that there is no Vicar General or Bishop or Chairman of the Synod 2014.



Before I go into the matters of this 6th message, I would like to remind delegates of the Synod and members of the ADOS of my other five messages earlier since May, 2014.





1st Message - The sham of AVCF has been identified in Synod 2010 where the illegal project in the Kokol Prayer Summit was exposed.  [That was the start of BISHOPGATE].





2nd message - Delegates of Synod’s congress 2014, please prepare some motion of no confidence in Albert CF Vun (AVCF) Bishop of Sabah to stop BISHOPGATE once and for all. [Now obsolete with the “disappearance” of AVCF].


3rd Message -In the AGM 2008 of ASC I raised the issue of the kindergarten closure in 2006 one year after the AVCF became the Bishop and I mentioned about the factor "Islamic teaching".  [so this hearsay of AVCF then would never be established now].



4th message - I must say that if Synod delegates are not prepared to design motions for the betterment of ADOS, then members of any matured major parishes should be encouraged to do appropriate motions to get rid of the crisis in ADOS which I call BISHOPGATE.  [again this proposal is simply ignored].







5th Message - The Constitution of Diocese of Sabah states in Article IX (7)  - Procedure in the Diocesan Synod – “At each ordinary meeting of the Diocesan Synod, an honorary auditor shall be appointed  who shall remain in office until the conclusion of the ordinary meeting of the Diocesan Synod and shall be eligible for re-appointment.” [ the audited accounts cannot be approved for two reasons namely the accounts of 2010 and 2011 were not re-audited and accounts of 2012 and 2013 as audited are unconstitutional and nobody can over rule this].



So are we as Anglicans in the last seven or eight years better nourished in some ways of the glaring shortcomings?



Have we searched our souls as delegates of the Synod and members of the Anglican church for the glaring shortcomings?



Have we given back to God the unfortunate shortcomings we face as a challenge and the blessings that we have received as God is God and let God be God?



We are the ears, eyes, hands, feet of God to do His work and have we done our roles well especially in the sort of demeaning BISHOPGATE?



Whatever we have done we have now arrived in another milestone in our lives in Christ as delegates and members of the Anglican Church gather for another meaningful Synod in August/September, 2014.



I believe a lot of development in spiritual and secular matters have gone through the Synod and I am proposing that we reflect on two very important matters of the Anglican Church namely the appointment of the successor of Bishop Albert and the management of our assets also the God’s blessing.



We all desire and pray that God would deliver His new direction for the Anglican Church in Sabah and beyond.  God has also spoken through many of us as we have been struggling for the truth in the Anglican Diocese.  Many are of the opinion that we need to deal with the past in order that the future can be on solid grounds as the truth would set us free.



We are urged to be very conscious how we deal with the assets in our Church, which are also the properties of God. Aren’t we blessed to be self regulatory and can we abuse that divine privilege? Can we just dispose of such earthly blessing without the thought of the Biblical consequences of facing the wrath of God?  Once back in 2006, Albert Vun was preaching in the 10am English service in the Dewan Grace that his blessing was not for sale as someone would pay him for the blessing under the water for a special wedding ceremony in Sipadan Island?  So I was urged to interrupt why the church land of God is sold to the freemason.  The congregation was stunned for a few minutes.  What happened thereafter, it was in the hands of Albert.



Since the arrival of Albert in Kota Kinabalu as the Bishop many land transactions were done and also questioned.  One of the land deals was the bishop’s own family piece in Menggatal.



The other much bigger one was the CL land of 13.86 acres in Likas sold for RM31m.  I know this disposal approval was done through the Synod for a long time already.  With Albert’s prerogative approval or his often abuse thereof the deal could be called off as we can see now how we have missed out on the God’s blessing had we held on to the land for the good of all.



Going by the market value of scarce land in Kota Kinabalu in recent years, it had been that the price movement of the land in Kota Kinabalu had been like a “rocket”.  It has been reported that a piece of land of less than 5,000 sq feet in Signal hill in 2013 was sold for RM7 million making it about  RM1,400 per sq feet. Then a piece of shoplot in Gaya Street was reported sold for RM3m for less than 2,000 sq ft making it RM1,500 per sq feet.  Then in early August, 2014 a city empty lot of about 30,000 sq ft was sold for RM20m making it RM667 per sq ft.  The latest land sold in Luyang of 2.75 ac  was for RM41.5m making it to RM348 per sq ft.  So ADOS land of 13.86ac was sold for RM31m making it RM52 per sq ft in 2009.  So could value of the land in Kota Kinabalu had increased by more than 6 folds in less than 5 years?  Whose fault for the low price?



How could the Anglican church lose out so much or more than RM100m in the Likas land and yet it was claimed by the professional that it was worth it then?



It may be good to let bygone be bygone but God knows what has happened.



Had we kept the land in Likas, it could open up for another massive church there as Albert was so adamant to squeeze the Celebration Centre into the ASC ground.



So over now to the Synod if something can be done about the sale of Likas land which I consider on legal grounds that the transaction was illegal.  I hope some concerned lawyers would look into that deal.  It was a major subject matter of my Writ of Summon against Albert in mid 2012.  Maybe the Synod 2014 would move a motion to re-open that rotten deal as it was one of the causes for the start of BISHOPGATE.



The other is the appointment of the successor of Bishop for the Synod 2014’s approval.



It is indeed a wonder that since the “disappearance” of Albert on 15th July, 2014, the ADOS had been on “auto-pilot” as who could be dealing with the management of the ADOS.  According to the Diocese Constitution, the assistant bishops were appointed to assist the Bishop of Sabah and when the Bishop is no longer around, the assistant bishops become redundant.  The archdeacon could be next to run the ADOS but Albert played “dirty” to remove the Archdeacon when he was too ill to be the Bishop hence that action was null and void.  If we want to lay blame on that it is also the fault of the Archbishop of APSEA Bolly Lapok for the worst development in ADOS.



So without a leader in ADOS, who could be organising the event of Synod 2014? We don’t want all sort of illegalities to happen in ADOS any more after the APSEA was once ruled by the High Court as “non legal entity”.  Aren’t we told to submit to the authority on earth when we are a “non legal entity”? Are we hypocrites at the highest level too?



Actually when did AVCF “die”?  Who could have issued the Diocesan Bulletin in August 2014 when Albert “disappeared” on 15th July, 2014?  According to the Diocesan Bulletin Albert “died” many times earlier as the word “LATE” was used several times in several earlier church events.  So who authorized the publication of that “untimely and premature” Diocesan Bulletin?  Could it be Mary Vun? I am told many church members refused to take that Diocesan bulletin with the “dead” man’s message on the front page as if he was “living”. That message could have been in June’s unpublished edition.  Why not done? We also were told that Albert had two more months to live in October, 2013 but he survived much longer and then suddenly the “Obituary” on 15 July, 2014 after spending so much God’s money in “treatment”.  That Diocesan bulletin could wait for the successor to issue.  Nothing urgent about that when the June 2014’s edition was skipped giving away the secret of the known “disappearance”.  It is indeed God’s Will in the several “late” instances and the skipped June 2014’s edition that a “cultish” motive as established was exposed in the sort of legacy especially Albert was “preaching” in his own funeral and the Archbishop just allowed it to happen.  Was Albert truly serving God or self serving for his ego of doom upon litigation matters in the civil courts and Ecclesiastical court?  We have yet to see his full medical report, his death certificate, and his Will as his assets could include properties bought from God’s money treated as his ill gotten gains.



I hope the delegates of Synod and church members share this common burden rather than bear it in silence that a true and fresh beginning would come to His church in Kota Kinabalu and beyond.



As I had proposed before, a professional Commission of Truth and Reconstruction be set up to deal with the past, present and the future to do the needful for much had been exposed in recent years.  While Jesus Christ can clear the mess for us spiritually, the secular matters must be dealt with properly according to the law and the constitution to let the transition be a blessing to all.  Others are watching as how we handle the very unfortunate BISHOPGATE.  Only yesterday at a function, a non Christian childhood friend came to tell me what he knew Albert for his wayward character from young.  Don’t ADOS under new leader want to correct that and hold Albert fully responsible for the BISHOPGATE?



Don’t the Standing Committee since 2006 want to clear the blame of its failings?



Don’t the delegates of Synod – past and present – clear the “crocodile tears” for the members of the church for all those crimes of Albert?



We have still one week to pray for our new direction as to whether a full Report of the BISHOPGATE be released for public consumption when the full PAC report of APSEA in 2012 although ordered by the Court of Appeal is still hidden from the very much aggrieved members.



If we are embarrassed, then what would God declare?



Let Jesus Christ give us His special birthday gift on 23 August as I have spiritual and physical context to declare that when ASC is holding a PCC meeting on that day.



Be bold for Christ sake as to live is for Christ and to die is gain.  Be a majority for Christ.



Thank you for reading and reflect.



Joshua Y. C. Kong



For full details of BISHOPGATE, go to Allsaintscathedralsabah.blogspot.com, thetruthasc.wordpress.com and bishopgateinanglicansabah.blogspot.com / bishopgate2.blogspot.com

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

why AVCF never bother to do this???

NRD wants Church to come forward

 | August 21, 2014
Having bin or binti in the name is not the criterion for a MyKad holder to be listed as Islam in the document.
my-kad300KOTA KINABALU: The National Registration Department (NRD) Sabah wants the Borneo Evangelical Mission, or Sidang Injil Borneo (SIB), to come forward with the name list of the 162 Christian individuals who had allegedly been classified as Islam in their MyKad because of bin or binti in their names.
Sabah NRD Deputy Director Adrian Allan Richard, in making this call, said “we can retrieve the records, if they are unhappy with the process, and go through each case personally”.
The NRD has records from the 1970s which have been digitised by the system. Earlier records have apparently not been digitised.
According to Adrian, the NRD has no jurisdiction to decide on the religion of MyKad holders.
“We go by documents,” he said in a media statement. “We have to check the parent’s religion, marriage certificate and other records before we list an individual’s religion.”
Having a bin or binti in the name, continued Adrian, is not the criterion for a MyKad holder to be listed as Islam in the document.
He was commenting on the SIB President, Jerry Dusing’s claim last Thursday during a public prayer rally that the NRD had claimed that it had lost the files of the 162 bin and binti cases which were reportedly lodged two years ago.
Jerry also alleged that the classification of Christians as Islam in their MyKad’s has caused the holders many difficulties. These included entering into legal marriages, obtaining birth certificates and school registrations.
Adrian denied that technical glitches, as implied by Jerry in his statement, can thwart the process of correcting the MyKad. “If there was an administrative error, it can be rectified by the system by reference to documentary evidence,” he assured.
He cautioned that mixed marriages from different religions, illegitimate marriages, divorces, missing marriage certificates, among others, “can complicate individual cases”.
The bottom line is that whether there are technicalities or no technicalities; the law will dictate how each case would be governed in the end, he added without elaborating.
“The NRD has no business determining and dictating the religion of a MyKad holder,” is the consensus among lawyers in the know. “Why advise those who don’t want to be classified as Islam to go through the Syariah Court?” he further said.

Monday, August 11, 2014

why so much disquiet?

August 12, 2014 - 8:56 am joshuakong823
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
why so quiet or disquiet now?
With the focus of the case of “dead” Bav, what is next?
Is there leave to appeal to the Federal Court granted?
If not granted, then when can we read the full PAC report as the ruling of the Appeal allows that? Where is the full PAC report?

What happen to the E-C now?
If not done, we should pursue to file a case of Contempt of court against the Bolly and others.
The mess in the ADOS and BAV was perpetrated by HoBs using some out of context bible verses.
Now Bolly cannot find a VG in ADOS, hence the “Satan” is in control and the “head” of ADOS.