OPEN LETTER TO DIOCESAN CHANCELLOR (DC) – PAST & PRESENT.

OPEN LETTER TO DIOCESAN CHANCELLOR (DC) – PAST & PRESENT.

To:  Rev Kenneth Thien – Diocesan Chancellor till August 2008

Datuk Stephen Foo Kiat Shin – Diocesan Chancellor from august, 2008 till todate.

Preamble:-

This OPEN letter would be published in my blog and emails to the ADOS and Anglican members and the House of Bishops and the Archbishop of Canterbury.

I hope those in positions should take note of this grave abuses of power by the Diocesan Chancellors in the Anglican Diocese of  Sabah (ADOS) as part of the Province of the Anglican Church in South East Asia (APSEA) and the Greater Global Anglican Communion via ACC.

2.         Constitution

2.1       The position in the Constitution of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah of the Diocesan Chancellor  is clearly stated in Article XVII which stipulates that The DC shall be appointed by the Bishop and shall hold office at his pleasure.  He shall be a qualified lawyer and shall be the legal adviser for the Bishop and the Diocese.

2.2       Where Diocese is defined in Article 1 (2) as a defined area of operation.

2.3       As the DC is the  legal adviser for the Bishop and the Diocese, the DC cannot act for the Bishop alone as in the internal crisis aka BISHOPGATE and in so doing so DC is acting against the Diocese where the church member reigns supreme where church member of ADOS  is defined in Article 1 (1).

2.4       Further DC is not a member of the Standing Committee under Article X and Article X (4) stipulates  that “the Standing Committee shall act for the Diocesan Synod between ordinary meetings of the Diocesan Synod, and shall advise and assist the Bishop in all matters connected with the finance and administration of the Diocese referred to it by him.

2.5       So the position and role of DC is very clear to be as independent in any conflict of the Bishop and the church members as in the prevailing scenario of ADOS.

2.6       What we have seen through and through in many scenarios affecting the Bishop Albert Vun Cheong Fui (AVCF) and Diocese (members), the DC has sided wholly with the Bishop who had actually created the crisis BISHOPGATE resulting in losses of tens of millions of Ringgit and more for more than six years and more as a priest.

2.7       When the Constitution of ADOS has been deliberately abused and violated by the Bishop for his known agenda, and the DC fails to advise him in the proper perspective, both should be taken to task.

2.8       Such behaviour of the Bishop is clearly of unsound mind and as such DC is unethical in his performance of duties as legal adviser for the common good of the Bishop and the Diocese under siege of the grievous and heinous deeds of Bishop now exposed and confirmed     

2.9       In such scenario why the power above the Bishop cannot remove both the Bishop and DC.

2.10  I am in action with the sole intention to resolve BISHOPGATE as soon as possible and the blessing would come from God.

3.         I can provide a long list of the acts of DC which had fallen short of propriety. [here is a sample only]

3.1      The behaviour and attitude of the DC Datuk Stephen Foo at the All Saints’ Cathedral Annual General Meeting 2012 held at the ASC on 1^st April, 2012 where he sided with the Bishop and his administration as the acting Dean/ Dean, where members had repeatedly decried the dictatorship of the Bishop AVCF especially the acting Dean/ Dean was missing in action.  The DC never even mentioned the illegal Chairman at the AGM.

3.2       It was reported in the Truthblog as follows:-

http://thetruthasc.wordpress.com/2012/07/25/a-demonic-attack/

[[[ 23. July 26, 2012 - 11:15 pm Messenger of Truth

To ‘Samtheprophet’ regarding your message on July 26/2012 at 7:54am on 1Corinthian 6:1-6. God’s Word is God’s Word. The message does not change but it is we humans who turn and twists it around.

God’s Word in 1Corinthian 6:1-6 remains UNCHANGED and is till the TRUTH.

What you are about to read is the HARD TRUTH regarding legal matters on AV and the Plaintiff. These happened BEFORE the Plaintiff goes to the Court to file an injunction against AV. Here is how it goes:-
1. TRUTH NO.1 – AV, through legal firm, Chin Lau Wong & Foo (of which Stephen Foo is a partner) sued the Plaintiff AND the Police regarding the Police Report filed by the Plaintiff on AV and his misdemeanors.
VERDICT: The suit was denied.
2. TRUTH NO.2 –

VERDICT: The suit was denied once again.

These are TRUE cases. Check with the legal system and see if these cases are indeed true.

Now, WHO do you think breaks God’s Word? AV or the Plaintiff? You be the Judge.]]]

3.3       Questions -

3.3.1   Question 1: Can DC Datuk Stephen Foo (DSF) instigate the first suit on behalf of the Bishop AV against Joshua Kong and the Police?

3.3.2   Question 2: Can x?

3.3.3   Question 3:  Bishop AVCF wrote in his August message to the Diocesan Synod 2012 (page 37) that it is not permitted in the Bible for me to file a suit against another Christian.  But how come, the said Bishop AVCF did it himself against me, ok or not?

3.4   Has the DC advised Bishop AVCF to withdraw his pastoral letter dated 5^th August, 2012 against Joshua Kong which remained posted in the Homepage of  ADOS since August, 2012 and I am not given a chance to rebut what the Bishop wrote in that pastoral letter which contains falsehood on the civil case..  . 

3.5  Has the DC advised the Bishop AVCF to use his own personal money and own facilities to defend his cases in the Provincial Complaint as investigated and my civil case?  As long as Bishop remains in office, he is using the church fund to defend himself for crimes he had committed.  The other irony is that the 5 complainants (May 2012) and 10 appellants (7^th & 8^th November, 2012) have to use own resources to deal with the Archbishop of APSEA.   The 5 complainants and 10 appellants did in the spirit to defend the ADOS and the Church for public interests.  I am also using my own resources to file the civil suit to defend the ADOS and Church for public interest.  If the guilty Bishop according to the Provincial Advisory Committee in 38 out of 40 issues raised by the 5 complainants can use the church funds and facilities including travels to defend himself, then the 5 complainants, the 10 appellants and myself can apply to the ADOS and the church for funds.

3.6  To make matters worst, DC DSF has been alleged to have advised Bishop AVCF to fight to the end (whether DC DSF had actually advised Bishop AVCF in such fashion is not relevant) while remaining as a Bishop even in Sabbatical leave from February, 2013.  In the latest development, DC DSF had accompanied Bishop AVCF to Kuching on  27^th and 28^th November, 2012 for the meeting of the House of Bishops on the appeal of 10.  DC DSF has clearly acted unethically and his costs of travel could have been paid from the ADOS fund. (DC DSF to confirm this?).  In this process, DC DSF is against the church while defending the guilty Bishop AVCF.  Only insanity of Bishop AVCF and DC DSF would ignore such development.

3.7   We have seen how DC DSF has replied in writing to Mr William Thien and how he had answered the members in a dialogue called by Bishop AVCF  at the All Saints’ Cathedral on 15^th October, 2012 in selective approaches.  All posted in the blogs.

3.8   The DC DSF had made false accusations against me as a messenger or whistleblower  (again bias) when I had been issued a Court Order/ Anton Piller Order to collect official documents from the ADOS office in Wisma Anglican on 23^rd July, 2012.  Is it right to attack me personally to defend the guilty Bishop AVCF?  In this way, DC DSF has committed contempt of court.

3.9 As to Rev Kenneth Thien (RKT)  and an ex DC, he had also acted bias when he prepared the Police Report for the Assistant Bishop John Yeo to lodge against me on 23^rd July, 2012 and that Police report turned out to be false. That report was done at the time the Court Order was served.

3.10         Also Rev Kenneth Thien spent much time on the instruction of Bishop AVCF to initiate a split within the Province of APSEA which has emerged as a tainted process of an ill motive within the Anglican Communion.

3.11         Both items (3.9 and 3.10) on Rev Kenneth Thien are unethical and the second item is illustrated in the Truthasc blog under the title “latest news”

https://thetruthasc.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/latest-news/comment-page-1/#comment-4383

3.12         Professionally DC DSF and DC RKT have failed to perform their duties in the handling of the  Trustee Incorporation Certificate under the Trustee Incorporation Ordinance (Sabah 148) possibly with very dire consequences for the acts and omissions of the sole trustee in Bishop of Sabah (registered trustee) with or without the appropriate advice of the DC.   Ignorance is no excuse in this instance.

3.13  Whatever irregularities or mal practice done by Bishop AVCF should have been reviewed by the DC since 2006 and all the shortcomings are now very costly indeed for ADOS.

3.14  Did the DC DSF and ex DC RKT present at the Diocesan Synod 2012 advised the Bishop AVCF about the illegal Synod in substantial and substantive measures including the very much questioned financial reports already subject to the Management Letter from the Honorary Auditor?  If not, why not? 

3.15         Finally, DC DSF and DC RKT should be reported to the Sabah Law Association for the unethical practice for many questionable developments now under scrutiny and challenge internally and in the Civil Courts.  Never use the prerogative power of the Bishop as accorded by the defective and bias Constitution of ADOS as an excuse for the shocking conduct and performance of the Bishop of AVCF –still unfolding- as the Bishop has multi roles and the full responsibility thereof in the ADOS and ASC and the church in general especially in his questioned role as the sole trustee as BISHOP OF SABAH (registered trustee) with lots of irregularities.

4.  I pray that you will respond to this OPEN letter as soon as possible and allow the resolution of BISHOPGATE in win-win-win scenario for all in the Christian communities in Sabah and beyond.   

5.  Please refer to the following blogs:-

http://allsaintscathedralsabah.blogspot.com/

http://bishopgateinanglicansabah.blogspot.com/

      https://thetruthasc.wordpress.com/

As Bishop and his gang including the DCs have claimed the blogs as lies, but never substantiated by them.  The more they try to address some of the pressing issues, the more lies they employ to cover their evil deeds like robbing the church and God’s money under their care.  Don’t use any scripture verses to protect your guilt in one way or another. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

6,   If anyone including the Bishop AVCF and his people around him cannot handle the resolution of  BISHOPGATE, please resign and restore whatever the ADOS and ASC and the church in general had suffered losses.

7.      Let others local members and beneficiaries come together to revamp the ADOS with a new beginning.

Thank you for reading,

Joshua Y. C. Kong

ADOS member, beneficiary and Plaintiff.

BAV on the way out?

http://thetruthasc.wordpress.com/2012/11/28/sos-from-bav/

 

November 28, 2012

SOS from BAV

Below is an sms from Bishop Albert Vun to his lieutenants today. Brothers and sisters don’t quit praying.
Msg from Bshp: Please pray.. The group is pressing me to resign or to get the HOB to Institute The ecclesiastical court.. I will be under tremendous pressure.. Need every ounce of God’s grace to survive.. 24 pg accusations including spending 8 millions for a white elephant project Kokol Prayer Summit?? All kinds of accusations that has no factual basis… I just received copy of their petitions. May the Lord have mercy… Please pray with me.. Thx Bishop

Share this:

• Press This
• Twitter
• Facebook
• 
  

Like this:

Like

Be the first to like this.

Written by thetruthasc Posted in News, The Truth Tagged with Bishop Albert Vun, House of Bishops

0 comments

November 28, 2012 - 11:23 am joshuakong823

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

God would deliver ADOS and ASC from the crimes of AVCF…
End to an era of TPW AVCF..Praise God.
Keep on fast and pray for the end is near..
Bishop Rennis should recuse himself in HOBs meeting today when the final decision is to be made.

Church affairs up to Supreme Court

http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2012/23-november/news/world/joy-for-church-in-zimbabawe-as-court-rules-in-its-favour-in-property-dispute

Joy for Church in Zimbabawe as court rules in its favour in property dispute

Posted: 23 Nov 2012 @ 01:07

Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on printMore Sharing Services3

by Pat Ashworth

ap

THE rule of law has triumphed and the Anglican Church in Zimbabwe has finally won justice in the Supreme Court, after a costly five-year legal battle, and a decade of attempts to deal with the excom­municated former Bishop of Harare and ally of President Mugabe, Nolbert Kunonga.
The British Ambassador to Zimbabwe, Deborah Bronnert, an Anglican worshipper in Harare, described the news as "a good day for Christians of all denominations, and for freedom of religion". The Bishop of Harare, the Rt Revd Chad Gandiya (above), told reporters after the judgment had been read on Mon­day: "We waited. We have been vin­dicated. This is God's doing."
Since seceding from the diocese in 2007 and setting up their own alternative church and province, Kunonga and his followers have terrorised and persecuted the legitimate Anglican Church. Aided by dubious court rulings, and often with the active co-operation of the police, they have appropriated its buildings and assets, and subjected worshippers to what the Archbishop of Canterbury described as "a grave litany of abuses" when he con­fronted President Mugabe in Harare last year ( News, 14 October 2011).
The diocese had been what Bishop Gandiya described as "cautiously optimistic" about the outcome of the hearing, held three weeks ago, when the evidence was properly considered for the first time and judgment was given against the excommunicated former Bishop of Manica­land, Elson Jakazi ( News, 26 Oc­tober).
All the appeals by Kunonga have been dismissed. He has been ordered to return the property, and pay some of the costs. The legal case centred on whether Kunonga and his followers had withdrawn their membership of the Anglican Church when they voluntarily left it, and whether they could therefore still be members of the Board of Trustees, a matter which vitally concerned the legitimacy and incumbency of the Bishop of Harare.
A judgment by Justice Ben Hlatsh­wayo in 2009, which recog­nised Kunonga as the incumbent bishop, and his supporters as the legitimate Board of Trustees, has now been overturned. Monday's judgment made clear that "the learned Judge was wrong in giving Dr Kunonga and his followers the right to possess and control the property of the Church without its consent. They had no right to con­tinue in possession of the congrega­tional buildings when they had departed from the fundamental principles and standards on which the Church is founded. They left it putting themselves beyond its ec­clesiastical jurisdiction."
The judges also pronounced: "The facts show that Dr Kunonga was no longer a Diocesan Bishop in Harare. . . When they left the Ang­lican Church, they disentitled them­selves from continuing as members of the Board of Trustees of the Church. . . They used the property and continued to control it without the approval of or authority from the Provincial Synod. . .
"When one leaves a club, one does not take its property with him or her. . . It is common cause that the property belongs to the Church. It has a right to an order for vin­dica­tion of its property from pos­ses­sors who have no right to have it."
Kunonga used the pretext of the issue of homosexuality to secede from the province. Over the many years of the dispute, this has been given credence and reported as fact, with scant regard to what had gone before: a campaign of alleged abuse and violence that led to an ecclesias­tical trial in 2005 on 38 counts that included incitement to murder. In an atmosphere of intimidation, the trial was aborted and Kunonga walked smiling from the court. He has still not been prosecuted for any of his crimes.
Reflecting on the origins of the dispute, the judges concluded: "A debate which had started in the Church some time back on the question whether homosexuality was being tolerated by the ecclesias­tical authorities reached crisis point in August 2007. . .
"Dr Kunonga and his followers held very strong views on the ques­tion of tolerance of homosexuality. . . [They] reached the stage where they regarded it as a matter of faith that homosexuals and members of the Church who supported and sym­pathised with them should not be associated with."
The judges reflected, however, that Kunonga's principle of exclu­sion of homosexuals and their sup­porters and sympathisers from the public worship of God, was opposed to "the fundamental principles of a free offer of redemption and salva­tion of Christ on the basis of which the Church is founded."
Victory has come too late for the late Bob Stumbles, Chancellor of the diocese of Harare, whose tireless campaigning for justice and precise documenting of legal developments over many years did so much to keep the Kunonga case in the public eye. Other lawyers involved in the early years have expressed their delight at the news. Jeremy Lewis, who received threats after prosecut­ing at Kunonga's aborted trial, said on Tuesday: "The roofs of our Ang­lican Churches will be raised, and our refurbished organs thunder the joyous day of reckoning we all knew would have to come. Its advent with Christmas is an added blessing."
Ms Bronnert said: "I am de­lighted at the news that the Ang­lican Church in Zimbabwe has won its court cases in the Supreme Court of Zimbabwe, and that now church property . . . should be returned to its rightful owners.
"I also welcome the spirit in which Bishop Chad Gandiya has responded to the news, and his call to his Church to be gracious in victory. I look forward to worship­ping in my own church building, and in the Anglican Cathedral in Harare."
Bishop Gandiya, who could not be consecrated in his cathedral, and has not been able to enter it since becoming Bishop of Harare, ex­pressed his happiness on Monday. "We were cautiously confident that things had changed and that the rule of law was going to take its course, which it has," he said. "What­ever caused the change, we feel vindicated and that we can move on with our lives and the work of the Church. There is great joy and excitement all around."
The diocese now faces a huge task in retrieving and repairing its property, much of which Kunonga had turned over to secular use, and restoring its vital health and edu­cation services.
Bishop Gandiya wanted to say, through the Church Times, a big thank-you for the support of the Anglican Communion, "to all those who have been supporting us and praying for us."
Dr Williams expressed his true delight at the news on Tuesday, de­scribing it as heralding a new era for the Anglican Church in Zimbabwe. "We can at last say that there is justice for a long-suffering and beleaguered community. . .
"The hope must also be that this is a sign of better things to come eventually for all the people of Zimbabwe: the rule of law is not, after all, extinct."



In an account of his sermon printed in The Zimbabwean, Dr Kunonga said that he too had been engaged in a campaign of expropriating white-owned properties. “I took 3800 church properties in the region since their title deeds were in my name. There was no way the properties could remain under charge of the church controlled by whites and their black puppets. Bishops such as Julius Makoni, Chad Gandiwa and others are MDC-T and furthered western interests,” he said.\

A new Dean is elusive for ASC

The mad Bishop AVCF wrote in ASC Bulletin on the likely new Dean to be appointed as AVCF wrote “The man needs to have sufficient experience.  He needs to be matured in the faith. He needs to be prayerful.  He needs to be able to teach the word of God well.  He need to have a passion for evangelism. He must be a man anointed  by the Holy Spirit. He must be a man who obeys the Lord without fear.  He must have a servant’s heart. And more…

We will see victory over our enemies “  AVCF ended his message of 25^th November, 2012.

Questions for AVCF:-

.1. “The man needs to have sufficient experience. 

JK – what experience does he really need?  Based on AVCF’s work performance, AVCF does not even have any relevant sufficient experience.  Maybe P. Lo got the experience to build many places of worships in the rural areas.

2.                  He needs to be matured in the faith.

JK- when a person in the to that level must be matured in the faith.  How does one measure faith when AVCF is so vindictive as he sent at least 14 senior priests away but denied.

3.                  He needs to be prayerful.

JK – Is a pastor so fast in building the Kokol Prayer Summit a prayerful person and go to the extent of building an illegal place of prayers?  That is the acting Dean of ASC.

  4.    He needs to be able to teach the word of God well.

JK – is someone always talks of appetite and delicious foods teaching the word of God?

Is someone who talks of the luxurious motor superbike capable to teach the word of God?

Is someone always shouting and scolding from the pulpit able to teach the Word of God well?

Is someone always crying before the AGM able to teach the world of God well?

Is someone always asking for more tithes according to Malachi able to teach the word of God well?

Is someone who use the God’s money for high life living able to to teach the word of God well?

Is someone always using prerogative power able to teach the word of God well?

That is the mentally sick AVCF.

4.                  He need to have a passion for evangelism.

JK – what is a passion for evangelism when someone and his gang travel to distant land of rich countries doing justice for the church money spent for what AVCF defines as passion for evangelism?  Is it true only a small group has such passion of evangelism to waste their time and church money in vain in the name of reaching out for holidays in distant land when the land without Sabah also in great need of evangelism.  What AVCF defines passion of evangelism is nothing but lust for love gifts from rich nations and neglect our own interior.

5.                   He must be a man anointed by the Holy Spirit.

JK- this is another deception as AVCF never has the Fruit of the Spirit hence AVCF is under the influence of another spirit.  Under the interpretation of Matthew 18, AVCF is a pagan as he does not want to solve his crisis he created in ADOS for twenty years.

6.                  He must be a man who obeys the Lord without fear. 

JK – Who is not encouraged to obey the Lord without fear?  Does AVCF really obey the Lord without fear when he does so many things as he so fancies for years as a priest?  All his deeds are all exposed in the blogs but he does not fear the Lord and he call what are posted in the blogs as LIES>

7.                  He must have a servant’s heart.

JK – why such a standard of AVCF when all priests are servants of God, but AVCF lives like a King in a palace renovated at RM1m for his comfort only and even does invite parishioners  who pays his keep for Christmas open house.  Has AVCF got a servant heart’s?  If not why is he acting dean and Bishop ?

*8,       And more…

JK- the Dean in AVCF must be biggest liar and spend church money without proper accounting and transparency.  AVCF must treat God’s money as his own to show off in 5 star hotels, business class travel, driving many cars and a super bike and very kind to some women?

9.  We will see victory over our enemies.

JK – Who are his enemies in ADOS and church none other he himself is the one amongst the enemies and surrounded by birds of the same feather flocking for some sugar dady in great deception…

So by such standard for a dean, only mad AVCF thinks he is qualified to hold dual positions for so long after getting rid of 14 senior priests..

But he is always missing in action at ASC and make YTC as his ILLEGAL  stooge.

This is not the first time a Dean – a good one to be appointed for ASC.

The mad AVCF in great disillusion .

ADOS is family business of AVCF

Why no Dean of ASC appointed since early 2006?

Why acting Dean AVCF call himself  DEAB of ASC?

Why acting Dean and Dean not occupying Deanery but occupied by a non qualified person?

Can acting Dean/ Dean simply let someone not from the Dean family to occupy Deanery for almost
6 years?

Why Stello Lo aka Miss Yek occupied the deanery and in what capaicity?

AVCF would know the real reason to let S Lo to occupy the Deanery.

AVCF is reluctant to vacate his acting Dean/Dean for more than 6 years stating today in
the ASC bulletin 25 November, 2012 that no one so far is qualified to occupy the position of Dean/ Deanery hence  S Lo is so qualified   possibly for a personal reason.

Maybe AVCF is having two positions and he al;so wants to occupy the deanery but .....

If there is no one qualified from amongst the ADOS clergy, then AVCF is even not qualified to do so for so long as it is already proven AVCF is unfit to be the bishop.

ADOS can appoint someone very qualified from outside to be the Dean by contract as it was once done before.

What AVCF is writing in the ASC bulletin on the appointment of the Dean is find the excuse to stay on the acting Dean to rob ASC as it is proven beyond doubt.

The earlier AVCF is removed as the Bishop is great joy to celebrate.

BTW, if Mary Vun qualified to be the principal of ASAA?  If she is not qualified why is she the principal for 4 years?

AVCF is greedy and mad.

If AVCF had appointed a dean of ASC, then S Lo would not live in the Deanery for a personal reason.

God helps us.

ADOS vehicles and their uses

Anyone with information on how the ADOS vehicles utilised, please inform me so that I can prepare a near complete report.

Thank you.

Confirmed 'crimes' of AVCF..TRUTH

 http://thetruthasc.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/1549/

November 21, 2012

How BAV & Stand Comm Misled the Church

A month ago, the Diocese published a reply from the Standing Committee to the Honorary Auditor’s management letter. It touched on the purchase of Bangkok Gardens Condominium, Sipitang land and Tenom shoplot. The reply stated all three transactions were proposed to Standing Committee before the transaction took place.

 My comments ---

What do we intend to do next?

Is it good enough to write and talk about the rottenness here?

If we want to act, it must be in the civil court as it is the crimes committed by a sole trustee.

So to start with, can someone sponsor a full page in a local newspapers demanding AVCF to explain all these irregularities?

Many would tell me what to do next but when I ask them to do it together, silence would prevail.

Why? Why? What is wrong with our Anglican members when other people just despise us as I meet others Christians and non Christians alike…

AVCF destroys ADOS in the ACC

http://www.anglicancommunion.org/commission/covenant/final/text.cfm

The Anglican Communion Covenant

Preamble
We, as Churches of the Anglican Communion, under the Lordship of Jesus Christ, solemnly covenant together in these following affirmations and commitments.  As people of God, drawn from “every nation, tribe, people and language” (Rev 7.9), we do this in order to proclaim more effectively in our different contexts the grace of God revealed in the gospel, to offer God’s love in responding to the needs of the world, to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace, and together with all God’s people to attain the full stature of Christ (Eph 4.3,13).

<><><>

Recently  APSEA signed this ACC and the ugly things in ADOS where AVCF lies, apologies, and lies thereafter is ruining ACC.

How can APSEA not act accordingly?

If not leave it to the Archbishop of Canterbury, quick please.

of Bishop Rennis and AVCF at the respective Installations

A Celebration of God’s Goodness, A Dedication to Christ’s Cause

Archbishop Bolly Lapok, Primate of the Province of South East Asia, in his sermon recognised that the role of the bishop in Singapore is a complex one. However at the heart, a bishop is called to be the shepherd of Christ’s flock and the steward of God’s household (John 21:15-17).
The Bishop-designate knocked three times on the closed doors of the Cathedral at the beginning of his installation service. When the doors were opened so did the skies above as showers of blessing rained down.


Comment by:
Bishop Albert Vun of Sabah
I am very excited as we have been close friends for many years. I know him to be Godly with a deep spiritual life. He will bring a freshness to the Provincial leadership and the Diocese of Singapore for I see every new change as a renewal, a great responsibility and the potential for growth.
The Installation and Investiture was witnessed by His Excellency, Dr Tony Tan, President of Singapore, his wife, Mr Lawrence Wong, Senior Minister of State for Education and Information, Communication and the Arts, MP Mr Christopher de Souza and his wife, and two former politicians Dr Seet Ai Mee and Mrs Lim Hwee Hua.

The Service culminated in a Garden party on the West and South Lawns of the Cathedral.

http://www.anglican.org.sg/index.php/blog/comments/a_celebration_of_gods_goodness_a_dedication_to_christs_cause

Churches’ role appreciated - newspaper reports on the consecration of the new Bishop of Sabah

Earlier, more than 1,000 parishioners, friends and well-wishers from all over Sabah braved the rain to converge on the All Saints’ Cathedral to witness the historical consecration and installation of The Reverend Canon Albert Vun Cheong Fui, 50. The nearby Parish Hall and Glory Hall were also packed to capacity.

The three-hour service began at 3pm. As the church bell chimed, the traditional procession of about 50 visiting bishops and archbishops, overseas and local clergies, canons, archdeacons and deans to the cathedral from Wisma Anglican had to be done by moving in vans and a tourist coach because of the rain.

The State Government appreciates the contributions by Christians and other religious organisations towards maintaining peace and harmony. Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Hj Aman said this effort is important, especially in a society that is as ethnically diverse as Malaysia’s and Sabah’s, in particular

The text of his speech was read by Assistant Minister to the Chief Minister, Datuk Edward Khoo. Some 1,200 people attended the function held at the Putera Theatre Ballroom.

http://www.globalsouthanglican.org/index.php/comments/churches_role_appreciated_newspaper_reports_on_the_new_bishop_of_sabah

My comments:-

What conclusion would you draw from here?

Would rain be a blessing and not tears of God?

So would the heaviest rain be most blessings when some people have to travel in vans (travel in vain to come to the Installation) for walking spaces?

Both have sort of VVIPS to attend the functions when the humble one ended in the garden party while another ended in 3 star restaurant where the CM would not likely  go.

Go on to reflect as what is happening in ADOS and HOBs today…

TEN COMMANDMENTS for ADOS as breached

TEN COMMANDMENTS for ADOS

How to keep quiet for so long?

All these information do have a  story to tell and I leave them to you to confirm this “love” story of sort but for the wrong reasons….and your guess is as good as mine…

Let me update you people with what are already exposed here by all sort of anonymous people’s postings ---

1.                  Why there is some people telling us that some people from Tawau regularly cry in public?  Why such ‘telling’ cries from some people only?  What do you think such cries do imply or convey?  Something is definitely hidden from the public eyes but God knows all.

2.                  Who were transferred from Tawau in 2006?  Sort of inseparable?  Why?  Tell us the stories slowly and surely, from those who may have the “tales of splendors”. Please?  Confessions, if any?  Soon would be known…

3.                   Who occupy the Deanery soon after heavy renovation in 2006 when the AVCF had another lodge to be heavily renovated too?

4.         Who then occupied the Deanery soon after AVCF left for his heavily renovated mansion up the hill?

5.         Was there a dean or acting dean in 2006?

6.         Was not the deanery meant for the acting dean/ dean and the family?

7.         Who was then occupying the deanery?  An extended family of sort?

8.         The property of the church belong to who?  Private property?

9.                  Do anyone want to link this to any other items in the blogs?  It is up to you.

10.       Any breach of ten commandments?

ADOS scholarships for who?

Now you are informed slowly but surely ---

http://www.anglicansabah.org/2010.1/Management%20Letter%20-%20Financial%20Year%20Ended%2031%20December%202010%20&%202011.htm

Attachment

Appendix A
Click HERE to download

Appendix B
Click HERE to download

Click B to get this

[ C ]	Scholarship Fund		Year 2011		Year 2010
1	Samuel Vun (Bishop Vun's Eldest Son)		12,005.00		10,275.00
2	Irene Kong (Rev Jeffery Kong's daughter)		14,387.00		15,000.00
3	Jonathan Leong (Rev Victor Leong's Son)		13,730.00		11,360.00
4	Sarah Vun (Bishop Vun's daughter)		15,000.00		15,000.00
5	Samuel Lo Qi Feng (Rev Philip Lo's Eldest son)		4,200.00		6,360.00
6		David Lo (Rev Philip Lo's 2nd son)		5,953.00
TOTAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND EXPENDITURES [ C ]: RM		65,275.00		57,995.00

Now you know who get the scholarships.

Questions:-

1.                  What is the selection criteria that two families with bright children get the

‘cheap’ fund?

2.                  Who head this committee?

3.         Other children of the 100 other clergies and pastors are not up to the notch to get scholarships?  Why?