The problem in the Standcom and lesser in the Synod are several folds and all working for themselves and so the AVCF would work to his advantages.
Say for example an exco member in SC is also a professional and the ADOS is loaded with assets and that is opportunity for the exco member to gain from professional fees and such people would just be drama for mutual interest to stay in office and such fees could be millions of Ringgit.
Another possibility is that someone in exco and synod may pretend to work for a Datuk who can in turn recommend certain persons to get Datukship and the comradeship would work against the church.
The other concept is that some people are power crazy hence want to stay close to someone in power and there lies all the ills for self interest working against the church. AVCF knows how to exploit such people by sweets of sort too to get his way.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The truth is AVCF is buying for his pocket to be filled with “xxx gains”.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Dear Dean, (Feet washing over in a few minutes)There was a washing of feet last year as per blog – (was it a farce?)
http://thetrutheng.com/2013/06/23/updated-a-step-towards-revival/#comments
When Peter refused to allow Jesus to wash his feet, Jesus said this, “If I do not wash you [Peter’s feet], you have no share with me.” John 13:8.
Now the ADOS and ASC is subject to more public cleaning of dirty “clothes or linen”.
http://thetrutheng.com/2014/02/13/how-bav-violated-the-constitution-lied/
Also more dirty linen is on for 38 of the 40 charges against Bishop Vun by the PAC.
http://thetrutheng.com/2014/02/20/pac-report-acquisition-of-sipitang-land/
and your recent acts against me at the EGM where you and the Bishop were defeated in item 7 and the Bishop in item 8 respectively.
If words are too difficult for reconciliation, then we do a proper FEET washing again and we wash each other feet or I wash yours.
Better still get Bishop Vun at 7.30am service to this act in FEET washing as his dirty linen is washed in public.
Let God be God.
God bless all,
Joshua
http://thetrutheng.com/2014/02/20/pac-report-acquisition-of-sipitang-land/comment-page-1/#comment-9718
0 comments
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Was the land a NT title ? If NT, whose name would appear in the
Title? Can the ADOS now present the title as an exhibit? Also we have
done some research in 2012 from newspapers’ advertisement the price per
acre would be less than RM100k. So why should we had paid RM850k? Who
actually closed the deal? If AVCF closed the deal, then it is a violated
of the Constitution as he claimed in the Court document that he had no
power over such affairs in the Constitution. So what is what now?
No comments:
Post a Comment