Why so quiet on Constitutions Amendment of ASC vis-a-vis ADOS

 To the Chairman of the sub-committee of Constitutions amendments or revamp


I don't know when Dr James Chhoa is going to contact me since November 2012.

I had presented 30 questions to AVCF, YTC, CSF but no replies or even acknowledgement of the 30 questions in fax, emails, blog etc since January 2013.

Most of these 30 questions need to be addressed by proper Constitution provisions which are absent or silent in the Constitutions of ASC and ADOS.  If every thing is done by the prerogative of one person as i have seen hence no answers are good.

In the past the Constitutions of ASC and ADOS were largely done by a few person especially the Bishop and no two ways or open dialogue.

So in this Constitutional amendments or revamp (depend on who do it), it must be open to a guideline of processes with draft proposals for members review plus final approval by AGM and EGM.  this was never done before.

Imagine the Ireland Anglican Constitution is 153 pages while Provincial and ADOS constitutions are about 30 pages hence we have the problems today.  We have seen so much distortions, and illegal applications of the crisis of BISHOPGATE largely due to prerogative and misapplication of the Constitutions of ASC and ADOS to favour the wrong parties.

Why the ASC website is not used for this review of the Constitutions of ASC?

Why the ADOS website is silent on the Constitution of ADOS if amendments are ongoing?

The ADOS and ASC belong to all and all should be involved to move forward in the Kingdom of God.

I hope I am useful here and nothing to hide now.

Joshua


Please be my seconder for this motion urgent.

This motion would indicate to the BMT as facilitator.
This motion if approved would assist the Constitution subcommittee to amend the
constitutions of ASC and also ADOS in the right footing.

When we know the full problems via an investigation, we can then
be in better position to find solution / check and balance.

Let this the first facilitator see this first case before his eyes.


Motions as proposed for All Saints’ Cathedral AGM on 24th March, 2013

Motion 2    We demand for a full investigation of the performance of the acting Dean since 2006 in ASC.  An investigation committee be formed in this AGM to look into all aspects of ASC vis-à-vis ADOS to declare Datuk AV as unfit to remain as Bishop.

RATIONAL:-

1. Platform for appropriate corrective actions including restitution of losses etc.

2. To firm up misleading accusations as denied.

3. For moral boosting, morale restoration and good practice.

4. To implement the vote against AVCF as acting Dean in last AGM as he did not resign accordingly..

Proposed by Joshua Y. C. Kong                               seconded by