Sunday, April 6, 2014

332- some issues for ASC & ADOS



Biblical speaking Diocesan Assessment is an abomination of the verse “Bring your tithe to the storehouse of God” as the clergy and Bishop always preach in prosperity gospel.  ADOS is not the storehouse of God as it is not a church which has siphoned off God’s money for some personal agenda.  To me this verse in the universal Bible means the whole earth as the storehouse not only any church and why only Christians have to treat God with respect.  All human being have to treat God our creator nicely.  It is timely that ADOS and ASC being the mother church has to address the Diocesan Assessment when the Bishop is not attached to any local church to earn his keep as any clergy. So we sow and reap the whirl wind.  .

    

AGM is the best forum or venue to put to rest the Anglican Crisis which I call BISHOPGATE since it surfaced in 2011, the Golden Jubilee year of ASC.

Bulletins and pulpits messages are all one way only.

All my three motions whether to be voted on or not are for the purpose of putting to rest BISHOPGATE for the good of all especially Christians and the public at large.

As the mother church ASC must go back to basic namely – the object of ASC.

Do you know the object of ASC?  Do we fulfill the object of ASC?

The objects of the Parish are in Article II of the ASC Constitutions namewly:-

(a)    To proclaim the gospel

(b)    To minister to the parishioners

(c)    To promote Christian fellowship, and

(d)    To promote any other activities for the advancement of the Kingdom of God.

In recent years, ASC has largely failed in its objects.

Instead of proclaiming the gospel, many verses in Bible are quoted for personal agenda of the leadership like the tithing and gospel of prosperity (which I will go into later under the Diocesan Assessment) and the recent ‘washing of feet” for deceitful feel good;   I heard numerous complaints of the lack of ministering to the parishioners and instead there is an agenda to divide the congregations to fight against one another especially in the last AGM’s elections of PCC;  How can ASC ever promote Christian fellowship when all the dirt of the Bishop or Bishopgate are exposed in the blogs and other Christians denominations are blaming Anglicans of disrepute or shame to Christianity;  if we cannot promote Christians fellowship, how can we promote any other activities for the advancement of the Kingdom of God?  Also the NGO as proposed by me on the resolution of Bishopgate would be the vehicle for external outreach apart for internal fellowship.



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Dean Chak what is the point of you staying on after your undesirable activities too many in a few months already exposed and the EGM’s rejection of item 7 is deemed to have rejected you, and so for the sake of the Anglican church, Rev Moses Chin be in your place now for a new beginning.

If my three motions were rejected because of the intervention of the Bishop, Bishop has already been rejected and should leave it to the members to decide.  The EGM’s rejection of item 8 is deemed to have limited the power of the Bishop as far as ASC is concerned.

He was also voted out as the acting Dean in 2012’s AGM but he stayed on till December, 2012 and ASC has enough of him “screaming” and all those matters raised in the PAC reports etc. 

You want to reject my 3 motions but go the press recently trying win with falsehood.
  

ASC – comments on AGM 2014



1.  With the financial statement in hard copy for All Saints’ Cathedral 2013, the Dean & Honorary Treasurer made a declaration be it statutory or otherwise “We, the undersigned hereby declare that the accompanying Unaudited financial statements as present on Page C are to the best of our knowledge  and understanding, correctly represent a true and fair view of the state of financial affairs of the Parish of All Saints’ Cathedral, Kota Kinabalu [no year?] ending 31st December, 2013.  The statement of Honorary Treasurer is undated.



2.  It is no April Fool as I write it on 1st April, 2014.  There is no excuse for such blunder of a false declaration to mislead others by a licenced Solicitor and a qualified accountant and possibly a member of MIA should be aware of what he should have declared and the consequence thereof.  Great damages done in all aspects.



  1. The report was made available one week before the AGM on 6th April, 2014 from 3pm.  {if this report was presented one hour before AGM, it is impossible to present this paper).
  2.  So God has finally spoken on ADOS vis-à-vis ASC on such triple whammies namely no auditor is available,  the Dean and Honorary Treasurer made FALSE declaration and the Balance Sheet was not balance – all appearing on the first three pages of the Financial Report (hard copy).

4.1  AVCF as Bishop cum acting Dean of ASC sowed for 6 years and reaps abundant shit (too much to write here) in God’s Church and not Albert’s church..



  1. I do not think there is a need to query or raise comments an unaudited account when the Balance Sheet does not balance which is another grave error if you read the declaration in the first paragraph..

       

ASC AGM  matters 2014



Bishop’s treatment



Bishop’s testimony and Thanksgiving in ADOS Bulletin of December, 2013, I quote “The Standing Committee has decided to cover all my treatment expense according to our present policy.”

The Honorary Secretary of the Standing committee in an attachment to the ASC Sunday bulletin wrote on 11 November, 2013 and quote “The existing policy of the Diocese on medical claims by any of our ministry staff is for the Diocese to pay 50% of the medical claims while the remaining balance 50% shall be borne by the local  parish where he/she is at the material  time posted.



He secretary further wrote “that Bishop Albert’s medical expenses will be drawn from Diocese Medical Fund.”



I believe Bishop’s statement is at variance with the statement of the Honorary Secretary.



Bishop’s testimony and thanksgiving also stated that some people had given him substantial funds to meet his medical treatment in Singapore.  Please confirm that Bishop had passed on the contribution to the Diocese Medical Fund since the Diocese will be responsible for the cost of treatments in Singapore or elsewhere. I hope the Auditor of the ADOS would scrutise this fund properly and that the Bishop’s treatment costs would be paid on his claims and full medical report. 



I also find it odd that the Bishop wrote “I am trusting the Lord wholeheartedly for the Lord to answer our prayers”  and yet he doubted the Lord but trusted medicine and the doctors.



Synod Delegates



Why are we not electing Synod delegates from this AGM?

I think it is reported that the Honorary Secretary had written to all parishes to elect Synod Delegates to the biennial Synod Conference due in August/September 2014.



The Bishop had also written to the parishes to ask the PCC to nominate Synod delegates to the Synod Conference.



So who is right?  If it is the duty of the AGM to elect the Synod delegates why is it this is not done here?



                                                                          

Parish Meeting in Constitution of Diocese of Sabah’s Article 1 (Definitions)  clause 8 means Annual General Meeting of the Parish..

Article XXIII 3 (a) The Lay representatives and alternative Lay Representatives shall be elected at a Parochial Meeting held before each ordinary meeting of the /diocese synod.  Here the Parochial meeting is the AGM not PCC meeting and so ASC had been in error or violation of the Constitution.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      









Celebration Centre



What is the latest for the Celebration Centre?  How much had been collected and then used for that but nothing to see on the ground?  On paper, where is the report on this ? 

If there is no report, that is already embezzlement.



Allah



ASC must make a stand on this word “Allah”. Irrespective of the Court decision, the stance by some people is that if the word is used in church, you are all Muslims like it or not? No wonder, we are in such a mess now.



Newspaper’s  Reports



Since 2012, ASC has been featured in the Daily Express as follows:-



  1. Article titled  “Bishop under probe” on 17th  July, 2012 and the reply  in a letter forum titled “Claim made in report was false” on 21st July, 2012 both were damaging to ASC and ADOS.
  2.  Article “Suit against Anglican bishop dismissed” Daily Express dated 6th March, 2014 with my name mentioned without consent.
  3. Letter “Church members divided over stand of Anglican archbishop” Daily Express dated 16th March, 2014 using the word “muslim”.



My comments are as follows:-



If some people are against going to the Civil Court, then why go to the public court in the Newspapers?   Why cannot we resolve it in ASC being the mother church?



AGM 2012, 2013



Many questions and comments on ASC had not been responded.  AGM is the only forum left to get answers while the bulletins and the pulpit only one way traffic and so how to clear all doubt if AGMs are also abused by the leadership.



EGM 2014



What is the status of the 6 items passed at the EGM held recently? 



Membership



  1. The status of the updating of the list of membership closed on 5th April, 2014?  What do you intend to do with those who had yet to respond to the updating?
  2. For the purpose of today AGM, what is the list to be used – old or new?
  3. Why are so many members are without the NRIC numbers especially for the Bahasa Malaysia congregation?



Minutes of AGM



The attendance of the members at the AGM should be recorded. 

No comments:

Post a Comment