Ruins to come

There are plenty of stories how rich and powerful people by whatever means straight or crooked to amassed more assets or fortune at the expense of others especially the poor, the underpriviledged and the oppressed. See all those land grabs now in Sabah. I know this person has a string of terrible scammings in Sabah as money and power can help manipulated any scenarios to make more money be it illegal or proper. You also know that those loaded with cash, the banks would not pay good interests and so such wealth could be invested in landed properties and land especially in those marketable regions. If you are a very rich man looking for good investment, would you prefer to deal with many landowners (known and unknown to the rich man) or a single landowner (known to the rich man) with land and properties spread out over the whole Sabah mostly in golden zones? This is a real story of a rich and powerful man who influenced an NGO to develop a piece of idle land in the city area for a multi storeyed building. Then the NGO was so tempted to go into with the approval of the council or exco. Everything was done and a loan was arranged. Somehow for whatever reason, the project was stalled due to financing/funding problem. So this man arranged the adequate loan for the project and took over the property without paying for the land. The land can easily be of value of RM20m. You can imagine, if that project was not completed in the initial scenario, the NGO would have to compensate the contractor for the abandoned project and no building to use. [more daylight robberies with this rich man on that property and nothing has happened despite some Police Reports]. If you attend SAFE meetings I can tell a string of stories of this rich man. Why I mentioned that scenario? It is a reality for the ASC/ADOS project on the CC when there is only little money raised when it is speculated that construction contract was already signed. If that is not true about the CC, then tell me what is the status now? It is also questionable if the consultants had been appointed when the members supposed to fund it are kept in the dark about the project from the start. BAV says all the items in the blog are false. Please list items by items for those false ones as I know there are a lot of truth in these postings here. It is obvious the gang of BAV also tried to post some incorrect items to mislead others but we can verify most of them. If BAV does not take it to task over the blog to prove he is right, then he is a ‘mocker and a liar’ I tell you there are already discrepancies in his two messages if we analyse them properly. Very sad indeed that BAV is linked to the rich and powerful man and soon the Anglican members would be the worst losers with assets worth RM1 billion and more to be lost one way or another. Who are then the biggest robbers of our Anglican treasures?. You are the judge but STOP it before it is too late. I was more convinced of the ruins to be on BISHOPGATE after the short trip on 23 April, 2012. So we need to act now on BISHOPGATE without any delay. Joshua Y. C. Kong