April Foo*L or what?

About the proposed EGM or even the reconvene of the AGM on 1st April, a real April fool with the FOO*L not so constructive and positive. The Chancellor should raise relevant issues like the validity of the AGM like the Chairman not properly authorised, the 2011 AGM's minute not signed, the legal implication of the massive deficit in two years, the Dean's warden report as inaccurate or cheating. the missing Dean's report, the reports and accounts only given one hour before the start of AGM. The learned Chancellor must know that any NGO under the Society act need to furnish the notice together with the relevant reports for the AGM two weeks before the AGM. Although ASC is not under the ROS, good governance should prevail. If the Dean or acting Dean is serious about his job, he should have a summary of the financial scenario and the two motions to be published in the Sunday Bulletin two weeks prior to the AGM. Is there any hanky panky here? The Hon Treasurer told the AGM that the meeting of the PCC on 19 March was not tabled the audited account. What a coincidence that the auditor signed the accounts and report also on that date, and yet the PCC did not go through the audited accounts before the AGM. So was this audit report back dated? Tell us the real scenario. I did ring up the church office asking for a copy of the reports etc on Friday - a few days before the AGM - but was told that translation had delayed the report for distribution. But it was already posted in this blog that the deficit was massive. So that is how our Dean or acting handle our AGM affairs and now he tells us we lie in this blog. I also want to know from the Chancellor if the membership of ASC is all valid especially some or many are foreigners. We need to establish this fact before we proceed to AGM or EGM for the purpose of elections and voting on motions for the good of ASC. Can we appoint a committee to scrutinise the membership list? Can foreigners be full members of any NGO including the ASC set up? It is also strange that what is the point of voting for any motion at AGM and EGM if the same person as acting dean/dean and Bishop finally decide on the resolutions. Are we sane as Christians in the ADOS and ASC where public interest can be ignored with a fraudulent onemanshow? So do something to put the rights and wrongs into proper perspective. Joshua Y. C. Kong