Monday, February 16, 2015

Bible verses to comfort all in a time like this

Pray unceasingly and be strong and victorious in God. Claim God's promise in Jesus mighty name.Joshua

2 Chronicle 7: 14  If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.


Isaiah 30:17King James Version (KJV)

17 One thousand shall flee at the rebuke of one; at the rebuke of five shall ye flee: till ye be left as a beacon upon the top of a mountain, and as an ensign on an hill.


Joshua 23:10King James Version (KJV)

10 One man of you shall chase a thousand: for the Lord your God, he it is that fighteth for you, as he hath promised you.



Leviticus 26:6-8King James Version (KJV)

6 And I will give peace in the land, and ye shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid: and I will rid evil beasts out of the land, neither shall the sword go through your land.
7 And ye shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.
8 And five of you shall chase an hundred, and an hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight: and your enemies shall fall before you by the sword.

Deuteronomy 28:25King James Version (KJV)

25 The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: thou shalt go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them: and shalt be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth.


The True History of Christendom and Islam

1.7K135210
cruzadasportadaU.S. President Barack Hussein Obama’s recent condemnation of medieval Christian history as a way to exonerate Islam is a reminder of how woefully ignorant (or intentionally deceptive) a good many people in the West are concerning the true history of Christian Europe and Islam.
The problem is that those who condemn things like the Crusades—including “mainstream” academics, journalists, movie-makers, and politicians—do so without mention of any historical context.  Worse, they imply “we” already know the context: evil popes and greedy knights exploiting Christianity to seize Muslim lands and wealth.  Or in the words of Karen Armstrong, “the idea that Islam imposed itself by the sword is a Western fiction, fabricated during the time of the Crusades when, in fact, it was Western Christians who were fighting brutal holy wars against Islam.”
Of course, the true story of Christendom and Islam is antithetically different.  Consider some facts for a moment:
A mere decade after the birth of Islam in the 7th century, the jihad burst out of Arabia.  Leaving aside all the thousands of miles of ancient lands and civilizations that were permanently conquered—today casually called the “Islamic world,” including Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and parts of India and China—much of Europe was also, at one time or another, conquered by the sword of Islam.
Among other nations and territories that were attacked and/or came under Muslim domination are (to give them their modern names in no particular order): Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Sicily, Switzerland, Austria, Hungary, Greece, Russia, Poland, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Lithuania, Romania, Albania, Serbia, Armenia, Georgia, Crete, Cyprus, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Belarus, Malta, Sardinia, Moldova, Slovakia, and Montenegro.
In 846 Rome was sacked and the Vatican defiled by Muslim Arab raiders; some 600 years later, in 1453, Christendom’s other great basilica, Holy Wisdom (or Hagia Sophia) was conquered by Muslim Turks, permanently.  (Till this day, Turkish Muslims celebrate this day of great rapine and slaughter.)
The few European regions that escaped direct Islamic occupation due to their northwest remoteness include Great Britain, Scandinavia, and Germany.  That, of course, does not mean that they were not attacked by Islam. Indeed, in the furthest northwest of Europe, in Iceland, Christians used to pray that God save them from the “terror of the Turk.” This was not mere paranoia; as late as 1627, Muslim corsairs raided the Christian island seizing four hundred captives and selling them in the slave markets of Algiers.
Nor did America escape.  A few years after the formation of the United States, in 1800, American trading ships in the Mediterranean were plundered and their sailors enslaved by Muslim corsairs.  The ambassador of Tripoli explained to Thomas Jefferson that it was a Muslim’s “right and duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to enslave as many as they could take as prisoners.”
In short, for roughly one millennium—punctuated by a Crusader-rebuttal that the modern West is obsessed with demonizing—Islam daily posed an existential threat to Christian Europe and by extension Western civilization.
And therein lies the rub: Today, whether as taught in high school or graduate school, whether as portrayed by Hollywood or the news media, the predominant historic narrative is that Muslims are the historic “victims” of “intolerant” Western Christians.  (Watch my response to a Fox News host asking why Christians have always persecuted Muslims.)
So here we are, paying the price of being an ahistorical society: A few years after the Islamic strikes of 9/11—merely the latest in the centuries-long, continents-wide jihad on the West—Americans elected (twice) a man with a Muslim name and heritage for president; a man who condemns the Christian Crusades while openly empowering the same ideology that the Crusaders fought for centuries.
Surely the United States’ European forebears—who at one time or another either fought off or were conquered by Islam—must be turning in their graves.
But all this is history, you say? Why rehash it?  Why not let it be and move on, begin a new chapter of mutual tolerance and respect, even if history must be “touched up” a bit?
This would be a somewhat plausible position—if not for the fact that, all around the globe, Muslims are still exhibiting the same imperial impulse and intolerant supremacism that their conquering forbears did.  The only difference is that the Muslim world is currently incapable of defeating the West through a conventional war.
Yet this may not even be necessary.  Thanks to the West’s ignorance of history, Muslims are flooding Europe under the guise of “immigration,” refusing to assimilate, and forming enclaves which in modern parlance are called “ghettoes” but in Islamic terminology are the ribat—frontier posts where the jihad is waged on the infidel, one way or the other.
All this leads to another, perhaps even more important point: If the true history of the West and Islam is being turned upside its head, what other historical “orthodoxies” being peddled around as truth are also false?
Were the Dark Ages truly benighted because of the “suffocating” forces of Christianity?  Or were these dark ages—which “coincidentally” occurred during the same centuries when jihad was constantly harrying Europe—a product of another suffocating “religion”?
Was the Spanish Inquisition—also condemned by Obama—a reflection of Christian barbarism or was it a reflection of Christian desperation vis-à-vis the hundreds of thousands of Muslims who, while claiming to have converted to Christianity, were practicing taqiyya and living as moles trying to subvert the Christian nation back to Islam?
Don’t expect to get true answers to these and other questions from the makers, guardians, and disseminators of the West’s fabricated epistemology.
In the future (whatever one there may be) the histories written about our times will likely stress how our era, ironically called the “information age,” was not an age when people were so well informed, but rather an age when disinformation was so widespread and unquestioned that generations of people lived in bubbles of alternate realities—till they were finally popped.
*
Don’t miss Shillman Fellow Raymond Ibrahim on The Glazov Gang discuss “ISIS’s Islamic Inspirations”:
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Subscribe to Frontpage’s TV show, The Glazov Gang, on YouTube and LIKE it on Facebook.




Ronny Cham and his gang of questioned lawyers should apologise to Anglican churches

















Ronny Cham sue all those who defame you because you are good lawyer.

 

The Truth

Seeking the truth behind Anglican Diocese of Sabah's Crisis
May 26, 2014 

Sad, Sad Day  http://thetrutheng.com/2014/05/26/sad-sad-sad/comment-page-1/#comment-15616

In fact they have also abdicated the defence of this court case to Bishop Albert Vun. This is a case between an Anglican member versus Archbishop Bolly Lapok who was represented by Ronny Cham. Yet when a judge asked Cham where does the Archbishop reside, Cham could not answer. The plaintiff’s lawyer Roderick Fernandes gave the answer to court. How can Cham not know where his client resides? Lest we accused a senior lawyer of being sloppy, his client is likely to be BAV. The next question is why did Bolly allow BAV to act on behalf of the Province? It fuels the speculation the HOB is in cahoots with BAV. Can we expect the three Bishops to be impartial at the ecclesiastical court?

The Truth

Seeking the truth behind Anglican Diocese of Sabah's Crisis
· About
January 5, 2015 http://thetrutheng.com/2015/01/05/hob-conceded-finally/

HOB Conceded Finally

We are glad that the legal case we took up against the House of Bishops (HOB) is finally behind us, after the Counsel for HOB, Ronny Cham withdrew the Motion for leave to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014. It was also agreed that there will be no order for Cost in the Federal Court. This means the case is finally closed.
Finally, the HOB accepted that it had lost the case and could not win at the Federal Court after the Court of Appeal gave its judgment against them in May. This is a wise decision on their part, because going forward may cost them more financially and bring greater humiliation if they lost again. This decision, although made at the last minute before the Federal Court started to hear its application, may be the most intelligent decision they made in this crisis.
We have yet to receive the refund of cost paid by us, amounting to RM 15,000.00 after the High Court awarded cost to the Defendant. When the judgment was overturned on appeal to the Court of Appeal,   the Defendant was ordered to refund us the money. In addition, the Defendant was also ordered to pay cost for the High Court and Court of Appeal proceedings amounting to RM30,000.00. These claims are long overdue. However, Ronny Cham had given our lawyer his word that HOB will settle the debt. Once these claims are received, we will write up the account and honor the pledge on how the fund shall be utilized. They have up to 7th December 2014 to pay the sum of RM 45,000.00 or else contempt action will be taken against them.
We had fought a good fight and we want to take this opportunity to thank our lawyer and our plaintiffs for their sacrifices. We also want to thank all who had support us in this cause, financially, with prayers and with encouragements. We thank God for His Grace to let truth be established and revealed. Let it be a lesson to all who are in authority that no one is above the law.
Legal Action Task Force

Share this:

· Twitter
· 

Related

Written by TheTruth Posted in News 

4 comments

What say Stephen Foo who decided to go on and on? Why stop now???
2. 
3. 
Dear The Truth,
5. 
Can it be make possible to post on the investigations, findings & recommendation done to HBO on the wholesale abuses
of BAV ( 40 abuses ) soon ?
ADOS parishioners has the absolute rights to know nothing but all the truth on the abuses done by the late BAV.
On behalf of my group, I thank you sincerely for an excellent job done, without this channel, things would have been swept under the carpet & ADOS would has gone bust by now.
6. 
7. 
8. January 6, 2015 - 12:51 pm No Through Road 
The disputed items of income – Fixed Deposit Interest and Properties Rental
9. 
Michael Tong, who succeeded Paul Chong as the Honorary Treasurer of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah from the year of 2012, had responded to the widespread criticism of church leaders’ dishonest behavior and acted “appropriately” by disclosing the Fixed Deposit Interest and Rental Income for the years of 2012 and 2013. 
10. 
He might have realized the serious consequences he has to face up if a conduct in which there is a design of an ulterior motive to commit deceit of the church funds is uncovered. His positive response, possibly due to professional ethics, has reflected the leadership’s recognition that it needs to improve governance, transparency and respond to public opinion.
11. 
The aforementioned income and that of Year 2010 and Year 2011 is given below for public information:
(A) Interest Income from Fixed Deposit at an average sum of RM35,000,000.00
Year 2012 – RM 926,226 / Year 2013 – RM876, 471
Year 2010 – RM 356,482 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00 
12. 
(B) Rental Income from Diocesan’s properties
Year 2012 – RM 468,036 / Year 2013 – RM456, 398
Year 2010 – RM 0.00 / Year 2011 – RM 0.00 
13. 
The above comparison has revealed a fact that may cause suspicion upon church leaders’ integrity. Church members are inclined to ask the following questions:
1. Why did the church receive only RM356, 482 as fixed deposit interest income for Year 2010? What was the prevailing interest rate in that year?
2. There was no fixed deposits interest received for Year 2011. Were there any special arrangements with the banks for the sum of RM35,000,000 placed with them?
3. Why did the church not receive any rental income for the years of 2010 and 2011?
4. Can Michael Tong release more details about the relevant income for the period from Year 2006 to Year 2009?
14. 
Perhaps, there are some other reasons that we do not know about and we need church leaders’ explanation.
15. 
16. 
17. January 6, 2015 - 5:18 pm No Through Road 
The maze-like Financial Report of the Anglican Diocese of Sabah
18. 
“Did Michael Tong rectify the past years’ accounting errors prior to his preparation of the Diocesan’s Financial Statements for Year 2012 and 2013?” This is the question that has been repeatedly asked by church members — solely due to the leaders’ lies and deception which have shattered their trust in them. 
19. 
Some of the accounting errors, which should be more appropriately regarded as “intentional mistakes” , were allegedly designed to siphon out church money , have aroused a great deal of church members’ interest in finding out how the entries involving the lost of more than 10 millions of Ringgit were posted in the ledgers.
20. 
For example, the late Bishop Vun, believed to have been misled and instilled with a sense of superiority by the Standing Committee, had blatantly violated the Diocesan’s Constitution by acquiring properties in Thailand and registered under private ownership. Not only did they went against the Constitution which does not allow them to buy properties outside Sabah and Labuan, they had for unknown reason posted the relevant entries under expenses instead of fixed assets in the ledger. Did the acquisition, which was factually transacted against the normal procedure, constitute any criminal offence? 
21. 
Unless there is a persuasive explanation that would justify this disputed issue, church members have every reason to believe that church leaders are dressing their unethical schemes under the guise of doing missionary work.
22. 
23. 
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
25. 
No through road, first the auditors for ADOS for 2012 and 2103 is unconstitutional as it is not honorary and so the precedence of illegalities aplenty of AVCF had been perpetrated like criminals. (please read the ADOS Constitution). Don’t expect anyone to do justice to the accounts after the rottenness since 2006. All those in the standing committee should be charged for criminal offence. Let them come forward now.
26. 
27. 
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
29. 
With this milestone case, ADoS much impact a sea change to the Province of Anglican Churches in South East Asia by transformation in concept, structure, supervision and management of the affairs of the church as a better vehicle to bring back the confidence of the public at large. Whatever happened in the past had been shrouded with secrecy and hidden agenda.

















Ronny Cham and his gang of questioned lawyers should apologise to Anglican churches.

We are glad that the legal case we took up against the House of Bishops (HOB) is finally behind us, after the Counsel for HOB, Ronny Cham withdrew the Motion for leave to the Federal Court on 24th November 2014. It was also agreed that there will be no order for Cost in the Federal Court. This means the case is finally closed

RC had withdrawn the application for notice of Appeal in the Federal Court on 24 Nov., 2014 and so he and his gang must publish an apology to the Christians and Anglicans for the disrepute to all.

Even when Albert (his defacto client) was not around since July, 2014, he made no effort to stop the rot since then but chose to drag on until Nov 2014 when all the way since 2012, the rottenness of Albert was known.

Ronny chose to ignore that even with my laborious suit against Albert in July, 2012 when his modus operandi was known.

So Ronny Cham ask your client Bolly Lapok to release what the High Court or later the Appeal court had dealt with - all the rubbish of Albert - to be exposed for proper cleansing and not to be swept under the carpet.

Ronny, you should know what is Contempt of Court and how can an article by Stephen Foo appear in Daily Express on 6th March, when the content is deemed a  CoC.  Apply to the Court to redeem yourself and your gang in this CoC so that you all can find some peace in JAIL.  Bring with you Bolly  Lapok as well and that is true justice to Christians.

I will move a motion in ASC AGM on 29 March, 2015.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

This posting of legacy should be removed now. SHAME

 Bolly, please publish Albert's crimes as per Court order as per Rosalind Liew and Rev C Fu.



This posting of legacy should be removed now.  SHAME.  Joshua



http://www.anglicansabah.org/2014.1/index.html



http://www.anglicansabah.org/2014.1/bishop_tribute2014.html


I eagerly expect and hope that I will in no way be ashamed, but will have sufficient courage so that now as always Christ will be exalted in my body, whether by life or by death. For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain. (Philippians 1:20-21)
Our beloved Bishop Datuk Albert Vun Cheong Fui went home to be with the Lord on the 15th July 2014. However, he left behind his legacy of faith and faithfulness for us to follow. He is a living testimony of a man who has sacrificed everything and lived his life for Christ.
Bishop Vun’s legacy of faith is seen in his zeal for the Lord. The evidence of his passion is expressed through the spirit of excellence in all that he did for the Diocese. He constantly challenges mediocrity, shifts paradigms and pushes boundaries so that our diocese does not lose its cutting edge and become irrelevant in an ever-changing world. Yet he did so without compromising the foundation of biblical truth and the authority of the Scripture.
He is a visionary - a catalyst for growth. He worked tirelessly to plant new churches and expands our mission horizon beyond the shores of Sabah. His desire to develop both rural and urban churches is seen in the overall increase in our facilities and infrastructure throughout our Diocese. He simply wanted the whole diocese to be strong.
The legacy of faithfulness is seen in him finishing strong for the Lord. In spite of his illness and battle with cancer, he worked tirelessly to the end. In his last sermon preached at the Cathedral, he challenged everyone to give their all, their best to the Lord. And it was not merely empty words but exemplified with every ounce of his strength.
Much more could have been said in his eight years of episcopacy. His concern in education, in social issues, in the training of full-time workers and many more will all bear testimony of his conviction in the years to come.
Bishop Albert Vun has passed on his baton to us to continue a legacy of what it means to “live is for Christ; to die is gain!”  We do continue to remember his wife Datin Mary, and children Samuel, Sarah and Andrew.