4th
Open message to Synod of Anglican Diocese of Sabah and members
I must say that if Synod
delegates are not prepared to design motions for the betterment of ADOS, then
members of any matured major parishes should be encouraged to do appropriate
motions to get rid of the crisis in ADOS which I call BISHOPGATE.
It is indeed very shameful and a
sham for a senior priest cum practising lawyer to have proposed some ridiculous
motions at the end of the Synod 2012 from the floor without following the time
factor of these motions. You all know
who were then the proposers and seconders as reported in the blogs of all the
illegalities in that Congress to shame the shameless AVCF. Yesterday, the Dean of ASC told the members
that any motions must go through the PCC and yet in the Synod 2012, motions
were released at the last minute from the floor. All rubbish in ADOS.
Today, I am writing this OPEN
message is because the sort of audited accounts of the Synod for 2010 and 2011
were heavily qualified by the honorary auditor but the treasurer Paul Chong was
too shameful to show the management letter to the delegates. Yet the rotten accounts were passed without
any objections.
The Synod members/ delegates if
you really want to serve God in his church to bring glory to God and not to
AVCF, then be prepared to face much criticism even if the accounts are audited
by an audit firm (not honorary one) at great expense to the members. I have
great reservation about the known auditor/auditors of the ADOS. So don’t pretend that everything would be
alright with an audit firm.
Just like the ASC’s accounts for
2013 as audited by the “ghost” auditor of an audit firm , it is still in a mess
and not true and fair hence it was rejected again by the adjourned AGM held on
29 June, 2014. The report of my queries
are posted in bishopgateinanglicansabah.blogspot.com calling for investigation
and review for frauds and misrepresentation.
I hope amongst the Synod
delegates will be capable accountants blessed by God to scrutinize every aspects
of the audited accounts of 2012 and 2013 when the re-audit of 2010 and 2011
(not done as promised) where the ADOS was swindled of tens of millions Ringgit
by the Bishop and the Standing Committee and yet bishop used to preached
robbing God and face the consequences thereof.
Some people may want to know why
I spend so much effort to save ADOS and ASC.
It is a repentant effort as if Paul Chong never became an accountant, he
would not have the “deceitful” opportunities to mislead so many members serving
in ASC and ADOS in various positions over a decade and more. All his devious acts had been reported in the
blogs. If I had not listened to Dean
Yong Chen Fah in those days to help Paul Chong as a reference to enable him to
pursuit accountancy in ACCA, he could not be in a position to “deceive” others
with his “capabilities”. Since I had
contributed to his qualification and the harm thereof in ASC and ADOS, I would
like the precarious scenarios to be rectified.
The golden opportunities have now come for the restitution of whatever
wrongs and damage control with the departure or missing Paul Chong in church.
ASC had scored a first and a
precious precedent to reject the audit firm’s version of account of 2013 and
other Anglican churches in Sabah and beyond
should take note of this. ASC has yet to
face a mountain of “crimes” if immediate rectification measures are not carried
out after the adjourned AGM.
So I hope the Synod in 2014
should now take early measures by ways of appropriate motions to put the God’s
house in ADOS in proper order.
My suggestion would be that ADOS
is a blood sucker of God’s money that had gone into the God’s storehouse namely
the church by a selective modus operandi known as Diocesan Assessment which had
been terribly abused by the bishop annually.
We don’t need the ADOS as the red herring in deceptive framework. Now Anglican churches are under so much
weight of the piling up sin of the bishop and his cronies so much so that it is
very hard for fertile ground in Sabah to reach
out to others. Even many Christians of
other denominations are blaming ADOS for the hardship and strains in evangelism
mocking the name of precious Jesus Christ at large like the work of satanic
attacks against the church in general.
So we need to move to disband ADOS in its present form and if we still
need a bishop, then the bishop would be only in spiritual matters leaving the
secular matters in the hands of the Board of Governors of learned and faithful
laity and senior clergy. Only then we
can revive the Anglican church in Sabah and
beyond.
We better act fast and do a
motion in this aspect and the “Bishop” should allow this to go forward for
win-win-win scenario as AVCF is the root of crisis in ADOS.
Joshua Y. C. Kong 30/6/2014
No comments:
Post a Comment