276. Ecclesiastical Court to happen?

Can Lapok be the chief judge is EC proceed after 29/1/2014 as Lapok is bias!!!  The Singapore's Bishop is also bias!!!  So what is the meaning of EC then?  laughing stock.  Joshua

 



We are entering a new 2014 with the unresolved crisis BISHOPGATE!!! How disgraceful indeed and Christians and non Christians are watching.  When we mention the politicians as corrupt, they will respond  look at the Bishop of Sabah, and what can you say further?  When we mention PM as corrupt, they will say look at Bolly Lapok, and what else to say?   So what is the New Year's resolution for the Anglican churches?  Get rid of AVCF and his gang as the fundamental cause for the likely demise of Anglican churches in South East Asia.  Joshua






 http://thetrutheng.com/2013/12/25/letter-to-the-house-of-bishops/comment-page-1/#comment-9130
By writing this letter to HOBs, it would mean Ecclesiastical Court is a bridge too far despite the High Court case and why not leave it till the Court's decision --and so my contribution is here--

The whole BISHOPGATE is so rotten and only God using 100% of His Anglican members in Sabah and beyond can do something to bring about a proper end to this so far endless possibilities for the removal of the AVCF and even the possibility of the removal of Bolly Lapok and others in the HoBs for the condoning the GUILT and CRIMES of AVCF long reported to BL.

I just wonder how BL and AVCF would use this letter to their advantage of doubt in the ongoing High Court case which the Judge may or may not deliver its direction via VC (Video Conferencing) on 24/1/2014.  This team letter is also written by  5 + 10 inclusive of the two plaintiffs in the ongoing High Court which commenced Hearing in Chamber on 3rd December, 2013 and exchange of Summons/ Affidavits?

It is indeed a surprise that BL had acknowledged this simple letter while I posted a bulky memorandum of the behaviour of AVCF in mid of 2012 by SkyNet with the conclusion that AVCF is mentally unfit to be the Bishop hence should be removed and now it is known he is really very sick mentally with his recent acts of recalcitrant in the removals, sackings, transfers of some of young clergies who could serve God for a few decades yet to come, not to mention the drummed up Pancreatic cancer and yet working full time as an irresponsible Bishop.

If not careful, when Bishop dies of whatever reasons, the family can hold the ADOS and HOB responsible for not honouring his socalled heavy medical treatment by appointing a acting Bishop.  Who would be held responsible then?  BL, HoB, SC, and the Synod??? What a real mess we are in getting messier because of the Satanic attacks via one person AVCF?   



worthy to watch - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpK8ji1tADg on the crimes of AVCF in similar context.



Would the Ecclesiastical Court to happen?  How much would that cost the ADOS?  How much would that cost the HoB of South East Asia?

There are already too costly to keep AVCF in office since 1980s.

How much have been 'robbed" by AVCF and his gang over the decades?

We need a confession from AVCF and his gang.

Why should the poor ADOS retain such a rotten character as AVCF lives on since his habits in childhood?

AVCF had been paying for his legal fees alone or the church has been paying for it in my civil case against him?

HoB Sea also retained the same lawyer and at what costs?

HoB Sea likely also to pay for the legal cost of the two plaintiffs for a failure of the HoB Sea to implement an E Court after the PAC's report.

AVCF would likely also employ the same lawyer to represent him if the case goes to the E Court.

So how much it is going to cost ADOS and AVCF to keep his job when we know what he does in decades.

Very sad for such a precedent which has actually destroyed ADOS and the Anglican churches.

Don't blame the whistle blowers but AVCF himself.

Joshua Kong 60138394513