Put ADOS in proper order

Dear Saints, I am trying my best to put the House of Anglicans in Sabah and beyond in proper order due to the change of Archbishop of Canterbury (AC) to Archbishop of APSEA in 1996 long over due for update. So it is very impoortant to know which House of Bishop with Bishop being singular appoint and install the 6th Bishop of Sabah. Who knows APSEA has passed on to AC as it is in the Constitution of the APSEA. If it is the AC install the 6th Bishop, there is legally no problem with the existing documents of appointment for the Bishop of Sabah as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustees) under the Trustee (Incorporation) Ordinance Sabah Cap 148 (TIO)- see document below. There are a few conditions under this TIO appointment namely--the Constitution of Diocese of Sabah where is Diocese is an area defined in Sabah; only one person in Bishop of Sabah; and appointed by AC. I have studied the two cases recently namely my case against AVCF and then ASC against Bolly. What I have learned I want to make sure sure we are on solid ground and not to be challenged again because of the public odium when what had happened since 2011. Stephen Foo knew about my challenge on this in my court documents. If we review the documents of my case both my counsel and that of AVCF, and the Appeal Judgement of ASC case against Bolly, there are certainly contradictions legally both in form and substance. So we must avoid such legal complicity in future with grave consequences. What we need to do it to update all the documents of the ADOS in several areas. But the important thing is that - had the 6th Bishop as the VC since August, 2014 done any update of the relevant documents of his appointment? Unless TIO document is updated for the APSEA to appoint him, the 6th Bishop remains an illegitimate Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). So the appointment of 6th Bishop must be delayed. I wrote to the 6th Bishop an email on this about 10 days ago, and has not received a reply. Timmie Liew’s notice revived my thought. It is fatal to have an illegal Bishop as the Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). Why? The ADOS Constitution must be updated as well before the 6th Bishop of Sabah to hold appointed office. If you study the ADOS Consitution which is one of the conditions of the Corporate body as Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee), You don’t see who can operate the bank account as it is silent about the role of the Honorary Treasurer? There is no mention of who is/are the signatory / signatories in the TIO or the ADOS Constitution. So I presume the sole trustee is the sole signatory of the bank account of ADOS but the account name is Diocese of Sabah rather then the corporate body and that is Bishop of Sabah (Registered Trustee). That is FATAL legally should anything goes wrong with the bank accounts and the bank deposits. We are no more in 1962, 1996 but 2015. After going through two high profile Court cases with the second one yet to be resolved fully, we must put our ADOS And ASC standing in the right perspective. In every corporate body, finance is so important and who can operate those operations. I believe the sole trustee cannot delegate the signatory of the bank account to any other persons unless spelt out In the ADOS Constitution. So we must press on to put the Anglican House in order. Thank you, Joshua see the documents there ---https://www.facebook.com/joshua.kong.75